From: Jing-Ting Wu <jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
ValentinSchneider <vschneid@redhat.com>, TejunHeo <tj@kernel.org>,
<wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<Jonathan.JMChen@mediatek.com>,
"chris.redpath@arm.com" <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"Vincent Donnefort" <vdonnefort@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
<lixiong.liu@mediatek.com>, <wenju.xu@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: HANG_DETECT waiting for migration_cpu_stop() complete
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 13:40:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93f4ce9486ec4b856ba0f3bfe956fc9b2d3cb4cf.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220907000741.2496-1-hdanton@sina.com>
On Wed, 2022-09-07 at 08:07 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On 5 Sep 2022 10:47:36 +0800 Jing-Ting Wu <jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com>
> wrote
> >
> > We meet the HANG_DETECT happened in T SW version with kernel-5.15.
> > Many tasks have been blocked for a long time.
> >
> > Root cause:
> > migration_cpu_stop() is not complete due to
> > is_migration_disabled(p) is
> > true, complete is false and complete_all() never get executed.
> > It let other task wait the rwsem.
>
> See if handing task over to stopper again in case of migration
> disabled
> could survive your tests.
>
> Hillf
>
> --- linux-5.15/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2322,9 +2322,7 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data
> * holding rq->lock, if p->on_rq == 0 it cannot get enqueued
> because
> * we're holding p->pi_lock.
> */
> - if (task_rq(p) == rq) {
> - if (is_migration_disabled(p))
> - goto out;
> + if (task_rq(p) == rq && !is_migration_disabled(p)) {
>
> if (pending) {
> p->migration_pending = NULL;
Because Peter have some concern for patch by Waiman.
We add Hillf's patch to our stability test.
But there are side effects after patched.
The warning appear once < two weeks.
Backtrace as follows:
[name:panic&]WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 32583 at affine_move_task
pc : affine_move_task
lr : __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked
Call trace:
affine_move_task
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked
migrate_enable
__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb
ip_finish_output
ip_output
The root cause is when is_migration_disabled(p) is true,the patched
version will set p->migration_pending to NULL by migration_cpu_stop.
And in affine_move_task will raise a WARN_ON_ONCE(!pending).
Kernel-5.15/kernel/sched/core.c:
static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
struct rq_flags *rf, int dest_cpu, unsigned int flags) {
...
If (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pending)) {
Task_rq_unlock(rq,p,fr);
return -EINVAL;
}
...
}
But the tasks have not been migrated to the new affinity CPU, so there
should be pending tasks to be processed, so p->migration_pending should
not be NULL.
Without patch:
When is_migration_disabled is true, then goto out and not set p-
>migration_pending to NULL.
static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data) {
...
If (task_rq(p) == rq) {
if (is_migration_disabled(p))
goto out;
}
...
}
With patch:
When is_migration_disabled is true and pending is true, goto else if
flow. Because p->cpus_ptr not updated when migrate_disable, so this
condition is always true and p->migration_pending will set to NULL.
static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data) {
...
If (task_rq(p) == rq && !is_migration_disabled(p) ) {
...
} else if (pending) {
...
If (cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), p-> cpus_ ptr)) {
p->migration_pending = NULL;
complete = true;
goto out;
}
...
}
Best regards,
Jing-Ting Wu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-22 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <88b2910181bda955ac46011b695c53f7da39ac47.camel@mediatek.com>
2022-09-07 0:07 ` Hillf Danton
2022-09-22 5:40 ` Jing-Ting Wu [this message]
2022-09-22 12:02 ` Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93f4ce9486ec4b856ba0f3bfe956fc9b2d3cb4cf.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=Jonathan.JMChen@mediatek.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lixiong.liu@mediatek.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vdonnefort@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wenju.xu@mediatek.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox