From: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
<zlang@kernel.org>, <fstests@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <hughd@google.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/736: don't run it on tmpfs
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 09:05:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <938ab47e-c68c-ea6e-7a9f-b9080529cf75@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H6bNpDnh=XYKgFOp4xTRHY2EDJ_MaSFx-nHfKnx8gQVkw@mail.gmail.com>
在 2024/7/29 22:32, Filipe Manana 写道:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 2:54 PM yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2024/7/24 21:30, yangerkun 写道:
>>> Hi, All,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay relay(something happened, and cannot use pc
>>> before...).
>>>
>>> 在 2024/7/21 1:26, Filipe Manana 写道:
>>>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 9:38 AM Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We use offset_readdir for tmpfs, and every we call rename, the offset
>>>>> for the parent dir will increase by 1. So for tmpfs we will always
>>>>> fail since the infinite readdir.
>>>>
>>>> Having an infinite readdir sounds like a bug, or at least an
>>>> inconvenience and surprising for users.
>>>> We had that problem in btrfs which affected users/applications, see:
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2c8c55ec-04c6-e0dc-9c5c-8c7924778c35@landley.net/
>>>>
>>>> which was surprising for them since every other filesystem they
>>>> used/tested didn't have that problem.
>>>> Why not fix tmpfs?
>>>
>>> Thanks for all your advise, I will give a detail analysis first(maybe
>>> until last week I can do it), and after we give a conclusion about does
>>> this behavior a bug or something expected to occur, I will choose the
>>> next step!
>>
>> The case generic/736 do something like below:
>>
>> 1. create 5000 files(1 2 3 ...) under one dir(testdir)
>> 2. call readdir(man 3 readdir) once, and get entry
>> 3. rename(entry, "TEMPFILE"), then rename("TMPFILE", entry)
>> 4. loop 2~3, until readdir return nothing of we loop too many times(15000)
>>
>> For tmpfs before a2e459555c5f("shmem: stable directory offsets"), every
>> rename called, the new dentry will insert to d_subdirs *head* of parent
>> dentry, and dcache_readdir won't reenter this dentry if we have already
>> enter the dentry, so in step 4 we will break the test since readdir
>> return nothing (I have try to change __d_move the insert to the "tail"
>> of d_sub_dirs, problem can still happend).
>>
>> But after commit a2e459555c5f("shmem: stable directory offsets"),
>> simple_offset_rename will just add the new dentry to the maple tree of
>> &SHMEM_I(inode)->dir_offsets->mt with the key always inc by 1(since
>> simple_offset_add we will find free entry start with octx->newx_offset,
>> so the entry freed in simple_offset_remove won't be found). And the same
>> case upper will be break since we loop too many times(we can fall into
>> infinite readdir without this break).
>>
>> I prefer this is really a bug, and for the way to fix it, I think we can
>> just use the same logic what 9b378f6ad48cf("btrfs: fix infinite
>> directory reads") has did, introduce a last_index when we open the dir,
>> and then readdir will not return the entry which index greater than the
>> last index.
>
> Don't forget to reset the index to whatever is the current last index
> when rewind() is called.
> We ended up with that bug in btrfs later, see:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e60aa5da14d01fed8411202dbe4adf6c44bd2a57
Thanks for your reminder, will change offset_dir_llseek too!
>
> Anyway, if the same mistake is made, it would be caught by a test case
> for fstests I submitted after:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git/commit/?id=68b958f5dc4ab13cfd86f7fb82621f9f022b7626
>
>
>
>>
>> Looking forward to your comments!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Erkun.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks again for all your advise!
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> tests/generic/736 | 2 +-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tests/generic/736 b/tests/generic/736
>>>>> index d2432a82..9fafa8df 100755
>>>>> --- a/tests/generic/736
>>>>> +++ b/tests/generic/736
>>>>> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ _cleanup()
>>>>> rm -fr $target_dir
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> -_supported_fs generic
>>>>> +_supported_fs generic ^tmpfs
>>>>> _require_test
>>>>> _require_test_program readdir-while-renames
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.39.2
>>>>>
>>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-30 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-20 8:35 Yang Erkun
2024-07-20 17:26 ` Filipe Manana
2024-07-24 13:30 ` yangerkun
2024-07-29 13:53 ` yangerkun
2024-07-29 14:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-29 14:26 ` yangerkun
2024-07-29 14:29 ` Chuck Lever III
2024-07-29 17:35 ` Filipe Manana
2024-07-30 1:02 ` yangerkun
2024-07-29 14:32 ` Filipe Manana
2024-07-30 1:05 ` yangerkun [this message]
2024-07-22 14:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-22 14:25 ` Chuck Lever III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=938ab47e-c68c-ea6e-7a9f-b9080529cf75@huawei.com \
--to=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox