linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] selftests: vDSO: parse_vdso: Make compatible with nolibc
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:43:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <937c99b3-3837-4510-be65-4eca3b280ce2@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250203143640-70c59c53-af45-40cb-9a52-6395b3fdd263@linutronix.de>



Le 03/02/2025 à 14:50, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:23:29PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Le 03/02/2025 à 10:05, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit :
>>> For testing the functionality of the vDSO, it is necessary to build
>>> userspace programs for multiple different architectures.
>>> It is additional work to acquire matching userspace cross-compilers with
>>> full C libraries and then building root images out of those.
>>> The kernel tree already contains nolibc, a small, header-only C library.
>>> By using it, it is possible to build userspace programs without any
>>> additional dependencies.
>>> For example the kernel.org crosstools or multi-target clang can be used
>>> to build test programs for a multitude of architectures.
>>> While nolibc is very limited, it is enough for many selftests.
>>> With some minor adjustments it is possible to make parse_vdso.c
>>> compatible with nolibc.
>>> As an example, vdso_standalone_test_x86 is now built from the same C
>>> code as the regular vdso_test_gettimeofday, while still being completely
>>> standalone.
>>>
>>> This should probably go through the kselftest tree.
>>
>> Not sure what are the expectations with this series.
> 
> In general it should also work for PPC,
> thanks for testing it.
> 
>> I gave it a try with vdso_test_gettimeofday and get the following:
>>
>> $ powerpc64-linux-gcc -nostdlib -nostdinc -ffreestanding
>> -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-stack-protector -include /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/nolibc/nolibc.h -I/home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/nolibc/
>> -isystem
>> /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/../../../usr/include
>> -std=gnu99 -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE= -isystem /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/uapi
>> vdso_test_gettimeofday.c parse_vdso.c  -o /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_gettimeofday
>>
>> make: Entering directory
>> '/home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO'
>> powerpc64-linux-gcc -nostdlib -nostdinc -ffreestanding
>> -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-stack-protector -include /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/nolibc/nolibc.h -I/home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/nolibc/
>> -isystem
>> /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/../../../usr/include
>> -std=gnu99 -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE= -isystem /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/uapi
>> vdso_test_gettimeofday.c parse_vdso.c  -o /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_gettimeofday
> 
> This log is confusing. It contains traces of "make" output but no "make"
> invocation. I'm also not sure if there were two different compilations
> or only one. Can you give the full commandline?
> For your testing it should be enough to enable
> "vdso_test_standalone_x86" in the Makefile for PPC.

Well, yes I copied/pasted too much.

I made some hacky modifications to the Makefile but I forgot the '| 
header' pattern. With it added it works as expected.

Do you have any plan to get it work with nolibc for all test programs in 
selftests/vDSO, not only the standalone x86 test ?

Christophe


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-03 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-03  9:05 Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 01/16] MAINTAINERS: Add vDSO selftests Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 02/16] elf, uapi: Add definition for STN_UNDEF Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-04 15:32   ` Kees Cook
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 03/16] elf, uapi: Add definition for DT_GNU_HASH Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-04 15:32   ` Kees Cook
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 04/16] elf, uapi: Add definitions for VER_FLG_BASE and VER_FLG_WEAK Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-04 15:10   ` Kees Cook
2025-02-04 15:17     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-04 15:32       ` Kees Cook
2025-02-04 15:33   ` Kees Cook
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 05/16] elf, uapi: Add type ElfXX_Versym Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-04 15:32   ` Kees Cook
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 06/16] elf, uapi: Add types ElfXX_Verdef and ElfXX_Veraux Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-04 15:33   ` Kees Cook
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 07/16] tools/include: Add uapi/linux/elf.h Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 08/16] selftests: Add headers target Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 09/16] selftests: vDSO: vdso_standalone_test_x86: Use vdso_init_form_sysinfo_ehdr Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 10/16] selftests: vDSO: parse_vdso: Drop vdso_init_from_auxv() Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 11/16] selftests: vDSO: parse_vdso: Use UAPI headers instead of libc headers Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 12/16] selftests: vDSO: parse_vdso: Test __SIZEOF_LONG__ instead of ULONG_MAX Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 13/16] selftests: vDSO: parse_vdso: Make compatible with nolibc Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-22 10:24   ` Willy Tarreau
2025-02-24 14:41     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 14/16] selftests: vDSO: vdso_test_gettimeofday: Clean up includes Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 15/16] selftests: vDSO: vdso_test_gettimeofday: Make compatible with nolibc Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03  9:05 ` [PATCH 16/16] selftests: vDSO: vdso_standalone_test_x86: Switch to nolibc Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 00/16] selftests: vDSO: parse_vdso: Make compatible with nolibc Christophe Leroy
2025-02-03 13:50   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-03 15:43     ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2025-02-03 16:14       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-22 10:26         ` Willy Tarreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=937c99b3-3837-4510-be65-4eca3b280ce2@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox