linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	scott@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:44:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9357a0fc-2c65-4956-b00b-0ea4eda2fb47@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf1aa0a4-08de-443f-a1a3-aa6c05bab38c@os.amperecomputing.com>

>
>
> 3. kprobe. S390's alloc_insn_page() does call set_memory_rox(), x86 
> also called set_memory_rox() before switching to execmem cache. The 
> execmem cache calls set_memory_rox(). I don't know why ARM64 doesn't 
> call it.

When I'm trying to find out the proper fix tag for this, I happened to 
figure out why ARM64 doesn't call it. ARM64 actually called 
set_memory_ro() before commit 10d5e97c1bf8 ("arm64: use PAGE_KERNEL_ROX 
directly in alloc_insn_page"). But this commit removed it. It seems like 
the author and reviewers overlooked set_memory_ro() also changes direct 
map permission. So I believe adding set_memory_rox() is the right fix.

Thanks,
Yang

>
> So I think we just need to fix #1 and #3 per the above analysis. If 
> this analysis look correct to you guys, I will prepare two patches to 
> fix them.
>
> Thanks,
> Yang
>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ryan
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Yang
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Yang
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>



      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-16 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-29 11:52 Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] arm64: Enable permission change on arm64 kernel block mappings Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04  3:40   ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-09-04 11:06     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 11:49       ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-09-04 13:21         ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-16 21:37       ` Yang Shi
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] arm64: cpufeature: add AmpereOne to BBML2 allow list Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 22:08   ` Yang Shi
2025-09-04 11:07     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-03 17:24   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-04  0:49     ` Yang Shi
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] arm64: mm: support large block mapping when rodata=full Ryan Roberts
2025-09-03 19:15   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-04  0:52     ` Yang Shi
2025-09-04 11:09     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 11:15   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 14:57     ` Yang Shi
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] arm64: mm: Optimize split_kernel_leaf_mapping() Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 22:11   ` Yang Shi
2025-09-03 19:20   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-04 11:09     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] arm64: mm: split linear mapping if BBML2 unsupported on secondary CPUs Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 16:59   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-04 17:54     ` Yang Shi
2025-09-08 15:25     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] arm64: mm: Optimize linear_map_split_to_ptes() Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 22:27   ` Yang Shi
2025-09-04 11:10     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 14:58       ` Yang Shi
2025-09-04 17:00   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-01  5:04 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full Dev Jain
2025-09-01  8:03   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-03  0:21     ` Yang Shi
2025-09-03  0:50       ` Yang Shi
2025-09-04 13:14         ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 13:16           ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-04 17:47             ` Yang Shi
2025-09-04 21:49               ` Yang Shi
2025-09-08 16:34                 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-08 18:31                   ` Yang Shi
2025-09-09 14:36                     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-09 15:32                       ` Yang Shi
2025-09-09 16:32                         ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-09 17:32                           ` Yang Shi
2025-09-11 22:03                             ` Yang Shi
2025-09-17 16:28                               ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-17 17:21                                 ` Yang Shi
2025-09-17 18:58                                   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-17 19:15                                     ` Yang Shi
2025-09-17 19:40                                       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-17 19:59                                         ` Yang Shi
2025-09-16 23:44               ` Yang Shi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9357a0fc-2c65-4956-b00b-0ea4eda2fb47@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --to=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox