Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Fix some typos in hugetlb module

[Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>]

On 27/09/25 12:19 pm, jianyun.gao wrote:
> There are som typos in the code comments as follows:
>
>    differenciate ==> differentiate
>    refernece ==> reference
>    permissons ==> permissions
>    indepdenent ==> independent
>    Spliting ==> Splitting
>
> Just fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: jianyun.gao <jianyungao89@gmail.com>
> ---
>   mm/hugetlb.c         | 6 +++---
>   mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 6 +++---
>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index eed59cfb5d21..8ff9edd09504 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2954,7 +2954,7 @@ typedef enum {
>   	 * NOTE: This is mostly identical to MAP_CHG_NEEDED, except
>   	 * that currently vma_needs_reservation() has an unwanted side
>   	 * effect to either use end() or commit() to complete the
> -	 * transaction.	 Hence it needs to differenciate from NEEDED.
> +	 * transaction.	 Hence it needs to differentiate from NEEDED.
>   	 */
>   	MAP_CHG_ENFORCED = 2,
>   } map_chg_state;
> @@ -5998,7 +5998,7 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   	/*
>   	 * If we unshared PMDs, the TLB flush was not recorded in mmu_gather. We
>   	 * could defer the flush until now, since by holding i_mmap_rwsem we
> -	 * guaranteed that the last refernece would not be dropped. But we must
> +	 * guaranteed that the last reference would not be dropped. But we must
>   	 * do the flushing before we return, as otherwise i_mmap_rwsem will be
>   	 * dropped and the last reference to the shared PMDs page might be
>   	 * dropped as well.
> @@ -7179,7 +7179,7 @@ long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   		} else if (unlikely(is_pte_marker(pte))) {
>   			/*
>   			 * Do nothing on a poison marker; page is
> -			 * corrupted, permissons do not apply.  Here
> +			 * corrupted, permissions do not apply.  Here

Can also fix the extra space between "apply" and "Here".

>   			 * pte_marker_uffd_wp()==true implies !poison
>   			 * because they're mutual exclusive.
>   			 */
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> index ba0fb1b6a5a8..e6f79b2c63ee 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int vmemmap_split_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, struct page *head, unsigned long start,
>   	if (likely(pmd_leaf(*pmd))) {
>   		/*
>   		 * Higher order allocations from buddy allocator must be able to
> -		 * be treated as indepdenent small pages (as they can be freed
> +		 * be treated as independent small pages (as they can be freed
>   		 * individually).
>   		 */
>   		if (!PageReserved(head))
> @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ static void __hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_folios(struct hstate *h,
>   		ret = hugetlb_vmemmap_split_folio(h, folio);
>   
>   		/*
> -		 * Spliting the PMD requires allocating a page, thus lets fail
> +		 * Splitting the PMD requires allocating a page, thus lets fail

lets -> let's or let us

>   		 * early once we encounter the first OOM. No point in retrying
>   		 * as it can be dynamically done on remap with the memory
>   		 * we get back from the vmemmap deduplication.
> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void __hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_folios(struct hstate *h,
>   		/*
>   		 * Pages to be freed may have been accumulated.  If we
>   		 * encounter an ENOMEM,  free what we have and try again.
> -		 * This can occur in the case that both spliting fails
> +		 * This can occur in the case that both splitting fails
>   		 * halfway and head page allocation also failed. In this
>   		 * case __hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_folio() would free memory
>   		 * allowing more vmemmap remaps to occur.

As Wei says, this patch can be merged with the earlier, thanks.