From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3FBC48BD1 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBBB6136D for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:41:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3EBBB6136D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 659746B0070; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:41:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 62FC26B0071; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:41:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4F7616B0072; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:41:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0027.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.27]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFED6B0070 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:41:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C335848 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:41:41 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78234449202.08.B329F7C Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3BD41AD7A4 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4G0V8l1CKJz6try; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 22:38:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 22:41:35 +0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.174.177.72) by dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 22:41:34 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] lib: Fix spelling mistakes in header files To: Christoph Lameter CC: Masami Hiramatsu , Dennis Zhou , Tejun Heo , Joe Perches , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , linux-kernel References: <20210609013451.13706-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20210609013451.13706-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Message-ID: <931f9505-0e4c-e339-92f9-e2c82f8f141c@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 22:41:33 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.72] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4E3BD41AD7A4 X-Stat-Signature: 9jptw1w4mmnqhxci47k4kgb1rojk7uo9 Authentication-Results: imf26.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf26.hostedemail.com: domain of thunder.leizhen@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=huawei.com X-HE-Tag: 1623249698-908961 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.001370, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2021/6/9 21:09, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021, Zhen Lei wrote: > >> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ struct lc_element { >> * for paranoia, and for "lc_element_to_index" */ >> unsigned lc_index; >> /* if we want to track a larger set of objects, >> - * it needs to become arch independend u64 */ >> + * it needs to become arch independent u64 */ > > it needs to become *an* arch independent u64 OK, I will also change "arch" to "architecture". > > > . >