Re: [PATCH 0/4] Optimize __vmalloc_node_range_noprof function.

[Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>]

On 03/03/25 9:39 pm, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 05:44:06PM +0800, Liu Ye wrote:
>> The use of variables real_size and real_align in function
>> __vmalloc_node_range_noprof is unreadable. Optimize it in four patches.
>>
>> Liu Ye (4):
>>    mm/vmalloc: Remove unnecessary size ALIGN in
>>      __vmalloc_node_range_noprof
>>    mm/vmalloc: Size should be used instead of real_size in
>>      __vmalloc_node_range_noprof
>>    mm/vmalloc: Remove the real_size variable to simplify the code in
>>      __vmalloc_node_range_noprof
>>    mm/vmalloc: Rename the variable real_align to original_align to
>>      prevent misunderstanding
>>
>>   mm/vmalloc.c | 20 ++++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> -- 
> Let me double check it. Quick question, this series does not
> introduce any functional change?

Yeah, the cover letter subject is misleading. IMHO it should be more 
like "Refactor" instead of "Optimize".
> 
> --
> Uladzislau Rezki
>