From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] implement "memmap on memory" feature on s390
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:42:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <920bb896-ee9e-4124-a4fc-f22d1439c95b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZVyu1gAinLEtg5RR@li-2b55cdcc-350b-11b2-a85c-a78bff51fc11.ibm.com>
On 21.11.23 14:21, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 02:13:22PM +0100, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
>> Approach 2:
>> ===========
>> Shouldnt kasan zero shadow mapping performed first before
>> accessing/initializing memmap via page_init_poisining()? If that is
>> true, then it is a problem for all architectures and should could be
>> fixed like:
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index 7a5fc89a8652..eb3975740537 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -1093,6 +1093,7 @@ int mhp_init_memmap_on_memory(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + page_init_poison(pfn_to_page(pfn), sizeof(struct page) * nr_pages);
>> move_pfn_range_to_zone(zone, pfn, nr_pages, NULL, MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
>> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>> index 77d91e565045..4ddf53f52075 100644
>> --- a/mm/sparse.c
>> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
>> @@ -906,8 +906,11 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
>> /*
>> * Poison uninitialized struct pages in order to catch invalid flags
>> * combinations.
>> + * For altmap, do this later when onlining the memory, as it might
>> + * not be accessible at this point.
>> */
>> - page_init_poison(memmap, sizeof(struct page) * nr_pages);
>> + if (!altmap)
>> + page_init_poison(memmap, sizeof(struct page) * nr_pages);
>>
>> ms = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
>> set_section_nid(section_nr, nid);
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, if this approach is taken, should page_init_poison() be performed
>> with cond_resched() as mentioned in commit d33695b16a9f
>> ("mm/memory_hotplug: poison memmap in remove_pfn_range_from_zone()") ?
>
> Sorry, wrong commit id.
>
> should page_init_poison() be performed with cond_resched() as mentioned in
> Commit b7e3debdd040 ("mm/memory_hotplug.c: fix false softlockup
> during pfn range removal") ?
I think people are currently looking into removing all that cond_resched():
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231107230822.371443-29-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com/T/#mda52da685a142bec9607625386b0b660e5470abe
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-21 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-14 18:02 Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-14 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm/memory_hotplug: fix error handling in add_memory_resource() Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-14 18:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-15 13:45 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-14 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm: use vmem_altmap code without CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-16 18:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-17 21:39 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-14 18:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] s390/mm: allocate vmemmap pages from self-contained memory range Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-14 18:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] s390/sclp: remove unhandled memory notifier type Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-16 19:33 ` David Hildenbrand
[not found] ` <20231114180238.1522782-2-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
2023-11-14 18:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm/memory_hotplug: fix memory hotplug locking order David Hildenbrand
[not found] ` <ZVTKk7J1AcoBBxhR@li-2b55cdcc-350b-11b2-a85c-a78bff51fc11.ibm.com>
2023-11-16 18:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-17 13:42 ` Sumanth Korikkar
[not found] ` <20231114180238.1522782-5-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
2023-11-14 18:27 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/memory_hotplug: introduce MEM_PHYS_ONLINE/OFFLINE memory notifiers David Hildenbrand
2023-11-15 14:23 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-16 19:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-15 15:03 ` Gerald Schaefer
2023-11-16 19:02 ` David Hildenbrand
[not found] ` <20231114180238.1522782-7-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
2023-11-14 18:39 ` [PATCH 6/8] s390/mm: implement MEM_PHYS_ONLINE MEM_PHYS_OFFLINE " David Hildenbrand
2023-11-15 14:20 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-16 19:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-16 19:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-17 13:00 ` Gerald Schaefer
2023-11-20 14:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-16 23:08 ` [PATCH 0/8] implement "memmap on memory" feature on s390 David Hildenbrand
2023-11-17 13:00 ` Gerald Schaefer
2023-11-17 15:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-17 19:46 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-21 13:13 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-21 13:21 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-21 14:42 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-11-21 19:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-22 11:44 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-17 13:56 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2023-11-17 15:37 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=920bb896-ee9e-4124-a4fc-f22d1439c95b@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox