From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EA5CA9EB7 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7F0214AE for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="MLQ5kM6G" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C7F0214AE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id AE97D6B0007; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A99606B000C; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:54:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9890F6B000D; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:54:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0117.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.117]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7582A6B0007 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 04E4A45B4 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:54:45 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76068239730.04.cast45_29623b7d45c25 X-HE-Tag: cast45_29623b7d45c25 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4428 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by imf38.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:54:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1571673283; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nYYBigk1mBDQOVv3cRmHPXRlvdDEVLUfmEpCEsjnHaA=; b=MLQ5kM6GfrEYSew47LXUdMKNxyDrawXQy+iIJUVovBR15/xt3UV6Zz7ptBfTrebBvpmpi6 z/w43sGaOjRHo4butT8nTZCAxUh/BnqP9jhi/EN2d8v2GFHTzpUHJF0RKA1kE7BvktoFyy sMgV+92mGhIs18xe7gaPv/kxTfQ/mZ8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-196-zBapdSUgNuSypj5z_X7zRQ-1; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:54:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5AC80183E; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.118.81] (unknown [10.36.118.81]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38E360126; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/page_alloc.c: Don't set pages PageReserved() when offlining To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Oscar Salvador , Mel Gorman , Mike Rapoport , Dan Williams , Wei Yang , Alexander Duyck , Anshuman Khandual , Pavel Tatashin References: <20191021141927.10252-1-david@redhat.com> <20191021141927.10252-2-david@redhat.com> <20191021144345.GT9379@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191021154712.GW9379@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: <91ecb9b7-4271-a3a7-2342-b0afd4c41606@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:54:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191021154712.GW9379@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-MC-Unique: zBapdSUgNuSypj5z_X7zRQ-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 21.10.19 17:47, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 21-10-19 17:39:36, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 21.10.19 16:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] >>> We still set PageReserved before onlining pages and that one should be >>> good to go as well (memmap_init_zone). >>> Thanks! >> >> memmap_init_zone() is called when onlining memory. There, set all pages = to >> reserved right now (on context =3D=3D MEMMAP_HOTPLUG). We clear PG_reser= ved when >> onlining a page to the buddy (e.g., generic_online_page). If we would on= line >> a memory block with holes, we would want to keep all such pages >> (!pfn_valid()) set to reserved. Also, there might be other side effects. >=20 > Isn't it sufficient to have those pages in a poisoned state? They are > not onlined so their state is basically undefined anyway. I do not see > how PageReserved makes this any better. It is what people have been using for a long time. Memory hole ->=20 PG_reserved. The memmap is valid, but people want to tell "this here is=20 crap, don't look at it". >=20 > Also is the hole inside a hotplugable memory something we really have to > care about. Has anybody actually seen a platform to require that? That's what I was asking. I can see "support" for this was added=20 basically right from the beginning. I'd say we rip that out and=20 cleanup/simplify. I am not aware of a platform that requires this.=20 Especially, memory holes on DIMMs (detected during boot) seem like an=20 unlikely thing. --=20 Thanks, David / dhildenb