From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15788C433E0 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A7020643 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:29:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D3A7020643 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 624B1900003; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:29:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5AD7E900002; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:29:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 49A9B900003; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:29:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0094.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.94]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE93900002 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:29:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin28.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35E18248068 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:29:52 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76829771424.28.week67_9064daf7ecf2d X-HE-Tag: week67_9064daf7ecf2d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2847 Received: from huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3DD1DE0E47021E1364E8; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:29:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.173.220.25) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 18 May 2020 20:29:41 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: tlb: Detect the ARMv8.4 TLBI RANGE feature To: Anshuman Khandual , Mark Rutland CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20200414112835.1121-1-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> <20200414112835.1121-2-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> <20200505101405.GB82424@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> <4d8cb48c-4f47-d966-f29b-3343bd966c5f@arm.com> From: Zhenyu Ye Message-ID: <9189159f-0df8-ef9a-5216-adc030856439@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 20:29:39 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4d8cb48c-4f47-d966-f29b-3343bd966c5f@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.173.220.25] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Anshuman, On 2020/5/18 12:22, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>>> static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64isar0[] = { >>>> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_RNDR_SHIFT, 4, 0), >>>> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_TLBI_RANGE_SHIFT, 4, 0), > > Hello Zhenyu, > > This is already being added through another patch [1] in a series [2] which primarily > has cpufeature changes. I will soon update the series making this feature FTR_HIDDEN. > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11523881/ > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=281211 > > I am planning to respin the series (V4) based on arm64 tree (for-next/cpufeature). So > could you please rebase this patch (probably dropping cpufeature related changes) on > upcoming V4, so that all the changes will be based on arm64 tree (for-next/cpufeature). > > - Anshuman > OK, I will rebase my patch based on your V4. Zhenyu