linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] mm, slab: always maintain per-node slab and object count
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:24:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <915667d7-a13e-423c-89a0-9f877143fd14@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEVVKH_XRmPUEJmo7xXwuNV3mCA8=SHxLdY9EjC9XFZsuqAXJw@mail.gmail.com>

On 7/22/24 4:16 PM, Xiongwei Song wrote:
> Don't we need the following changes for this patch?

Yes thanks, will fix!

> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index c1222467c346..e6beb6743342 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -4967,9 +4967,9 @@ init_kmem_cache_node(struct kmem_cache_node *n)
>         n->nr_partial = 0;
>         spin_lock_init(&n->list_lock);
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n->partial);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
>         atomic_long_set(&n->nr_slabs, 0);
>         atomic_long_set(&n->total_objects, 0);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n->full);
>  #endif
>  }
> 
> Thanks,
> Xiongwei
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:29 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> Currently SLUB counts per-node slabs and total objects only with
>> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG, in order to minimize overhead. However, the detection
>> in __kmem_cache_shutdown() whether there are no outstanding object
>> relies on the per-node slab count (node_nr_slabs()) so it may be
>> unreliable without CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. Thus we might be failing to warn
>> about such situations, and instead destroy a cache while leaving its
>> slab(s) around (due to a buggy slab user creating such a scenario, not
>> in normal operation).
>>
>> We will also need node_nr_slabs() to be reliable in the following work
>> to gracefully handle kmem_cache_destroy() with kfree_rcu() objects in
>> flight. Thus make the counting of per-node slabs and objects
>> unconditional.
>>
>> Note that CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is the default anyway, and the counting is
>> done only when allocating or freeing a slab page, so even in
>> !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG configs the overhead should be negligible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>> ---
>>  mm/slub.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> index 829a1f08e8a2..aa4d80109c49 100644
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -426,9 +426,9 @@ struct kmem_cache_node {
>>         spinlock_t list_lock;
>>         unsigned long nr_partial;
>>         struct list_head partial;
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
>>         atomic_long_t nr_slabs;
>>         atomic_long_t total_objects;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
>>         struct list_head full;
>>  #endif
>>  };
>> @@ -438,6 +438,26 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache_node *get_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node)
>>         return s->node[node];
>>  }
>>
>> +static inline unsigned long node_nr_slabs(struct kmem_cache_node *n)
>> +{
>> +       return atomic_long_read(&n->nr_slabs);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void inc_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node, int objects)
>> +{
>> +       struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
>> +
>> +       atomic_long_inc(&n->nr_slabs);
>> +       atomic_long_add(objects, &n->total_objects);
>> +}
>> +static inline void dec_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node, int objects)
>> +{
>> +       struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
>> +
>> +       atomic_long_dec(&n->nr_slabs);
>> +       atomic_long_sub(objects, &n->total_objects);
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Iterator over all nodes. The body will be executed for each node that has
>>   * a kmem_cache_node structure allocated (which is true for all online nodes)
>> @@ -1511,26 +1531,6 @@ static void remove_full(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n, struct
>>         list_del(&slab->slab_list);
>>  }
>>
>> -static inline unsigned long node_nr_slabs(struct kmem_cache_node *n)
>> -{
>> -       return atomic_long_read(&n->nr_slabs);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static inline void inc_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node, int objects)
>> -{
>> -       struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
>> -
>> -       atomic_long_inc(&n->nr_slabs);
>> -       atomic_long_add(objects, &n->total_objects);
>> -}
>> -static inline void dec_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node, int objects)
>> -{
>> -       struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
>> -
>> -       atomic_long_dec(&n->nr_slabs);
>> -       atomic_long_sub(objects, &n->total_objects);
>> -}
>> -
>>  /* Object debug checks for alloc/free paths */
>>  static void setup_object_debug(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
>>  {
>> @@ -1871,13 +1871,6 @@ slab_flags_t kmem_cache_flags(slab_flags_t flags, const char *name)
>>
>>  #define disable_higher_order_debug 0
>>
>> -static inline unsigned long node_nr_slabs(struct kmem_cache_node *n)
>> -                                                       { return 0; }
>> -static inline void inc_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node,
>> -                                                       int objects) {}
>> -static inline void dec_slabs_node(struct kmem_cache *s, int node,
>> -                                                       int objects) {}
>> -
>>  #ifndef CONFIG_SLUB_TINY
>>  static bool freelist_corrupted(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
>>                                void **freelist, void *nextfree)
>>
>> --
>> 2.45.2
>>
>>
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-26 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-15 20:29 [PATCH RFC 0/6] mm, slub: handle pending kfree_rcu() in kmem_cache_destroy() Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] mm, slab: make caches with refcount of 0 unmergeable Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-21  2:36   ` David Rientjes
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] mm, slab: always maintain per-node slab and object count Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-21  2:37   ` David Rientjes
2024-07-22 14:16   ` Xiongwei Song
2024-07-26 10:24     ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] mm, slab: unlink sysfs and debugfs immediately Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] mm, slab: simplify kmem_cache_release() Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] mm, slab: asynchronously destroy caches with outstanding objects Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-15 20:29 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] kunit, slub: add test_kfree_rcu() Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-21  2:39 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] mm, slub: handle pending kfree_rcu() in kmem_cache_destroy() David Rientjes
2024-07-22  6:49   ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=915667d7-a13e-423c-89a0-9f877143fd14@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sxwjean@gmail.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox