From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: aarcange@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, bfields@fieldses.org,
bp@alien8.de, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, corbet@lwn.net,
dave.hansen@intel.com, david@redhat.com, ddutile@redhat.com,
dhildenb@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, hughd@google.com,
jlayton@kernel.org, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
linmiaohe@huawei.com, luto@kernel.org,
mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, mhocko@suse.com,
michael.roth@amd.com, mingo@redhat.com, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, qperret@google.com, rppt@kernel.org,
seanjc@google.com, shuah@kernel.org, steven.price@arm.com,
tabba@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, vannapurve@google.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com,
wei.w.wang@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 10/10] KVM: selftests: Test KVM exit behavior for private memory/access
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:31:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90aaa4ab85fa5e3d5641793e2a4873282eb16556.1678926164.git.ackerleytng@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1678926164.git.ackerleytng@google.com>
"Testing private access when memslot gets deleted" tests the behavior
of KVM when a private memslot gets deleted while the VM is using the
private memslot. When KVM looks up the deleted (slot = NULL) memslot,
KVM should exit to userspace with KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT.
In the second test, upon a private access to non-private memslot, KVM
should also exit to userspace with KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT.
Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
.../kvm/x86_64/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index bafee3c43b2e..0ad588852a1d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/nested_exceptions_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/platform_info_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/private_mem_kvm_exits_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/set_sregs_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/smaller_maxphyaddr_emulation_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c8667dfbbf0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC.
+ */
+#include "kvm_util_base.h"
+#include <linux/kvm.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "processor.h"
+#include "test_util.h"
+
+/* Arbitrarily selected to avoid overlaps with anything else */
+#define EXITS_TEST_GVA 0xc0000000
+#define EXITS_TEST_GPA EXITS_TEST_GVA
+#define EXITS_TEST_NPAGES 1
+#define EXITS_TEST_SIZE (EXITS_TEST_NPAGES * PAGE_SIZE)
+#define EXITS_TEST_SLOT 10
+
+static uint64_t guest_repeatedly_read(void)
+{
+ volatile uint64_t value;
+
+ while (true)
+ value = *((uint64_t *) EXITS_TEST_GVA);
+
+ return value;
+}
+
+static uint32_t run_vcpu_get_exit_reason(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
+
+ return vcpu->run->exit_reason;
+}
+
+const struct vm_shape protected_vm_shape = {
+ .mode = VM_MODE_DEFAULT,
+ .type = KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM,
+};
+
+static void test_private_access_memslot_deleted(void)
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ pthread_t vm_thread;
+ void *thread_return;
+ uint32_t exit_reason;
+
+ vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(protected_vm_shape, &vcpu,
+ guest_repeatedly_read);
+
+ vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
+ EXITS_TEST_GPA, EXITS_TEST_SLOT,
+ EXITS_TEST_NPAGES,
+ KVM_MEM_PRIVATE);
+
+ virt_map(vm, EXITS_TEST_GVA, EXITS_TEST_GPA, EXITS_TEST_NPAGES);
+
+ /* Request to access page privately */
+ vm_mem_map_shared_or_private(vm, EXITS_TEST_GPA, EXITS_TEST_SIZE, false);
+
+ pr_info("Testing private access when memslot gets deleted\n");
+
+ pthread_create(&vm_thread, NULL,
+ (void *(*)(void *))run_vcpu_get_exit_reason,
+ (void *)vcpu);
+
+ vm_mem_region_delete(vm, EXITS_TEST_SLOT);
+
+ pthread_join(vm_thread, &thread_return);
+ exit_reason = (uint32_t)(uint64_t)thread_return;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(exit_reason, KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT);
+ ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory.flags, KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE);
+ ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory.gpa, EXITS_TEST_GPA);
+ ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory.size, EXITS_TEST_SIZE);
+
+ pr_info("\t ... PASSED\n");
+
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+static void test_private_access_memslot_not_private(void)
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ uint32_t exit_reason;
+
+ vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(protected_vm_shape, &vcpu,
+ guest_repeatedly_read);
+
+ /* Add a non-private memslot (flags = 0) */
+ vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
+ EXITS_TEST_GPA, EXITS_TEST_SLOT,
+ EXITS_TEST_NPAGES, 0);
+
+ virt_map(vm, EXITS_TEST_GVA, EXITS_TEST_GPA, EXITS_TEST_NPAGES);
+
+ /* Request to access page privately */
+ vm_set_memory_attributes(vm, EXITS_TEST_GPA, EXITS_TEST_SIZE,
+ KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE);
+
+ pr_info("Testing private access to non-private memslot\n");
+
+ exit_reason = run_vcpu_get_exit_reason(vcpu);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(exit_reason, KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT);
+ ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory.flags, KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE);
+ ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory.gpa, EXITS_TEST_GPA);
+ ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory.size, EXITS_TEST_SIZE);
+
+ pr_info("\t ... PASSED\n");
+
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM));
+
+ test_private_access_memslot_deleted();
+ test_private_access_memslot_not_private();
+}
--
2.40.0.rc2.332.ga46443480c-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-16 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-16 0:30 [RFC PATCH 00/10] Additional selftests for restrictedmem Ackerley Tng
2023-03-16 0:30 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] KVM: selftests: Test error message fixes for memfd_restricted selftests Ackerley Tng
2023-03-16 0:30 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] KVM: selftests: Test that ftruncate to non-page-aligned size on a restrictedmem fd should fail Ackerley Tng
2023-03-16 0:30 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] KVM: selftests: Test that VM private memory should not be readable from host Ackerley Tng
2023-03-16 0:30 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] KVM: selftests: Exercise restrictedmem allocation and truncation code after KVM invalidation code has been unbound Ackerley Tng
2023-03-16 0:30 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] KVM: selftests: Generalize private_mem_conversions_test for parallel execution Ackerley Tng
2023-03-16 0:30 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] KVM: selftests: Default private_mem_conversions_test to use 1 memslot for test data Ackerley Tng
2023-03-16 0:31 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] KVM: selftests: Add vm_userspace_mem_region_add_with_restrictedmem Ackerley Tng
2023-03-16 0:31 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] KVM: selftests: Default private_mem_conversions_test to use 1 restrictedmem file for test data Ackerley Tng
2023-03-16 0:31 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] KVM: selftests: Add tests around sharing a restrictedmem fd Ackerley Tng
2023-03-16 0:31 ` Ackerley Tng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90aaa4ab85fa5e3d5641793e2a4873282eb16556.1678926164.git.ackerleytng@google.com \
--to=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=dhildenb@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox