Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "splice: Do splice read from a buffered file without using ITER_PIPE"

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 16.02.23 10:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15.02.2023 14:01, David Howells wrote:
>> Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> next-20230213 introduced commit d9722a475711 ("splice: Do splice read from
>>> a buffered file without using ITER_PIPE") which broke booting on any
>>> Qualcomm ARM64 device I grabbed, dereferencing a null pointer in
>>> generic_filesplice_read+0xf8/x598. Revert it to make the devices
>>> bootable again.
>>>
>>> This reverts commit d9722a47571104f7fa1eeb5ec59044d3607c6070.
>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>>
>> Commit d9722a47571104f7fa1eeb5ec59044d3607c6070 was part of v13 of my
>> patches.  This got replaced yesterday by a newer version which may or may not
>> have made it into linux-next.
>>
>> This is probably a known bug fixed in the v14 by making shmem have its own
>> splice-read function.
>>
>> Can you try this?
>>
>> 	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=iov-extract
> next-20230216 boots fine again, thanks!
> 
>>
>> (Also, can you include me in the cc list as I'm the author of the patch you
>> reverted?)
> Ugh.. I thought b4 would have done that for me.. weird..

Right, and usually it's nicer to comment on the problematic patches, 
asking for a fix or a revert, instead of sending reverts.

My 2 cents.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb