From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f71.google.com (mail-ed1-f71.google.com [209.85.208.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC736B0007 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:30:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f71.google.com with SMTP id h26-v6so2187421eds.14 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 41-v6si2213038edr.186.2018.08.09.07.30.53 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] resource: Merge resources on a node when hot-adding memory References: <20180809025409.31552-1-rashmica.g@gmail.com> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: <8fe4bac8-9ee3-de95-095d-2e915d9f366a@suse.cz> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:30:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180809025409.31552-1-rashmica.g@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Rashmica Gupta , toshi.kani@hpe.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bp@suse.de, brijesh.singh@amd.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jglisse@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, malat@debian.org, bhelgaas@google.com, osalvador@techadventures.net, yasu.isimatu@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com On 08/09/2018 04:54 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote: > When hot-removing memory release_mem_region_adjustable() splits > iomem resources if they are not the exact size of the memory being > hot-deleted. Adding this memory back to the kernel adds a new > resource. > > Eg a node has memory 0x0 - 0xfffffffff. Offlining and hot-removing > 1GB from 0xf40000000 results in the single resource 0x0-0xfffffffff being > split into two resources: 0x0-0xf3fffffff and 0xf80000000-0xfffffffff. > > When we hot-add the memory back we now have three resources: > 0x0-0xf3fffffff, 0xf40000000-0xf7fffffff, and 0xf80000000-0xfffffffff. > > Now if we try to remove some memory that overlaps these resources, > like 2GB from 0xf40000000, release_mem_region_adjustable() fails as it > expects the chunk of memory to be within the boundaries of a single > resource. > > This patch adds a function request_resource_and_merge(). This is called > instead of request_resource_conflict() when registering a resource in > add_memory(). It calls request_resource_conflict() and if hot-removing is > enabled (if it isn't we won't get resource fragmentation) we attempt to > merge contiguous resources on the node. > > Signed-off-by: Rashmica Gupta Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka