linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
To: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@gentwo.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: simplify SLAB_* flag handling
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 11:46:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ee3efbd-e24d-4e7b-ab3b-6b0efd62296b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0fa27da8-d523-77f7-0473-bb317ec9d83e@gentwo.org>

On 17/01/2025 23:13, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2025, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
>
>> index a29457bef626..3b07cdaac3ae 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>> @@ -305,18 +305,6 @@ struct kmem_cache *__kmem_cache_create_args(const char *name,
>>  		goto out_unlock;
>>  	}
>>
>> -	/* Refuse requests with allocator specific flags */
>> -	if (flags & ~SLAB_FLAGS_PERMITTED) {
>> -		err = -EINVAL;
>> -		goto out_unlock;
>> -	}
> I think we should keep checking for invalid flags.

The commit that introduced this check [1] aimed to ensure that no
allocator-specific flag is passed to kmem_cache_create(), so it seemed
to me it was no longer needed now that allocator-specific flags are gone.

Having said that, we could keep it in order to reject flags that are not
supposed to be passed to kmem_cache_create() (e.g. SLAB_SKIP_KFENCE).
With that approach we'd just need to clear SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS below if
!CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG (and get rid of CACHE_CREATE_MASK).

- Kevin

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1478553075-120242-2-git-send-email-thgarnie@google.com/

>> -	/*
>> -	 * Some allocators will constraint the set of valid flags to a subset
>> -	 * of all flags. We expect them to define CACHE_CREATE_MASK in this
>> -	 * case, and we'll just provide them with a sanitized version of the
>> -	 * passed flags.
>> -	 */
>>  	flags &= CACHE_CREATE_MASK;
> This would silently clear some flags instead of creating an error.





  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-21 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-17 11:32 Kevin Brodsky
2025-01-17 22:13 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2025-01-21 10:46   ` Kevin Brodsky [this message]
2025-01-24 15:41     ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ee3efbd-e24d-4e7b-ab3b-6b0efd62296b@arm.com \
    --to=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox