From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Ayush Jain <ayush.jain3@amd.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, zhansayabagdaulet@gmail.com,
tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com,
raghavendra.kodsarathimmappa@amd.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Narasimhan.V@amd.com,
Santosh.Shukla@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: mm: ksm: Fix incorrect evaluation of parameter
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:35:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e4d9fa7-7550-87a9-ead1-2d2a8691cdab@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728060109.4403-1-ayush.jain3@amd.com>
On 28.07.23 08:01, Ayush Jain wrote:
> A missing break in kms_tests leads to kselftest hang when the
> parameter -s is used.
> In current code flow because of missing break in -s, -t parses
> args spilled from -s and as -t accepts only valid values as 0,1
> so any arg in -s >1 or <0, gets in ksm_test failure
>
> This went undetected since, before the addition of option -t,
> the next case -M would immediately break out of the switch
> statement but that is no longer the case
>
> Add the missing break statement.
>
> ----Before----
> ./ksm_tests -H -s 100
> Invalid merge type
>
> ----After----
> ./ksm_tests -H -s 100
> Number of normal pages: 0
> Number of huge pages: 50
> Total size: 100 MiB
> Total time: 0.401732682 s
> Average speed: 248.922 MiB/s
>
> Fixes: 9e7cb94ca218 ("selftests: vm: add KSM merging time test")
I think this actually fixes 07115fcc15b4 ("selftests/mm: add new
selftests for KSM") that added the "t" parsing.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-28 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-28 6:01 Ayush Jain
2023-07-28 6:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests: mm: add KSM_MERGE_TIME tests Ayush Jain
2023-07-28 14:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 14:35 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-07-28 16:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests: mm: ksm: Fix incorrect evaluation of parameter Ayush Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e4d9fa7-7550-87a9-ead1-2d2a8691cdab@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Narasimhan.V@amd.com \
--cc=Santosh.Shukla@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ayush.jain3@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=raghavendra.kodsarathimmappa@amd.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=zhansayabagdaulet@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox