From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: fix endless looping over same migrate block
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 19:03:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e445d60-e8b1-7172-4577-20e7f28d1e9d@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230731172450.1632195-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On 8/1/2023 1:24 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> During stress testing, the following situation was observed:
>
> 70 root 39 19 0 0 0 R 100.0 0.0 959:29.92 khugepaged
> 310936 root 20 0 84416 25620 512 R 99.7 1.5 642:37.22 hugealloc
>
> Tracing shows isolate_migratepages_block() endlessly looping over the
> first block in the DMA zone:
>
> hugealloc-310936 [001] ..... 237297.415718: mm_compaction_finished: node=0 zone=DMA order=9 ret=no_suitable_page
> hugealloc-310936 [001] ..... 237297.415718: mm_compaction_isolate_migratepages: range=(0x1 ~ 0x400) nr_scanned=513 nr_taken=0
> hugealloc-310936 [001] ..... 237297.415718: mm_compaction_finished: node=0 zone=DMA order=9 ret=no_suitable_page
> hugealloc-310936 [001] ..... 237297.415718: mm_compaction_isolate_migratepages: range=(0x1 ~ 0x400) nr_scanned=513 nr_taken=0
> hugealloc-310936 [001] ..... 237297.415718: mm_compaction_finished: node=0 zone=DMA order=9 ret=no_suitable_page
> hugealloc-310936 [001] ..... 237297.415718: mm_compaction_isolate_migratepages: range=(0x1 ~ 0x400) nr_scanned=513 nr_taken=0
> hugealloc-310936 [001] ..... 237297.415718: mm_compaction_finished: node=0 zone=DMA order=9 ret=no_suitable_page
> hugealloc-310936 [001] ..... 237297.415718: mm_compaction_isolate_migratepages: range=(0x1 ~ 0x400) nr_scanned=513 nr_taken=0
>
> The problem is that the functions tries to test and set the skip bit
> once on the block, to avoid skipping on its own skip-set, using
> pageblock_aligned() on the pfn as a test. But because this is the DMA
> zone which starts at pfn 1, this is never true for the first block,
> and the skip bit isn't set or tested at all. As a result,
> fast_find_migrateblock() returns the same pageblock over and over.
>
> If the pfn isn't pageblock-aligned, also check if it's the start of
> the zone to ensure test-and-set-exactly-once on unaligned ranges.
>
> Thanks to Vlastimil Babka for the help in debugging this.
>
> Fixes: 90ed667c03fe ("Revert "Revert "mm/compaction: fix set skip in fast_find_migrateblock""")
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index dbc9f86b1934..eacca2794e47 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -912,11 +912,12 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
>
> /*
> * Check if the pageblock has already been marked skipped.
> - * Only the aligned PFN is checked as the caller isolates
> + * Only the first PFN is checked as the caller isolates
> * COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX at a time so the second call must
> * not falsely conclude that the block should be skipped.
> */
> - if (!valid_page && pageblock_aligned(low_pfn)) {
> + if (!valid_page && (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) ||
> + low_pfn == cc->zone->zone_start_pfn)) {
> if (!isolation_suitable(cc, page)) {
> low_pfn = end_pfn;
> folio = NULL;
> @@ -2002,7 +2003,8 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> * before making it "skip" so other compaction instances do
> * not scan the same block.
> */
> - if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) &&
> + if ((pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) ||
> + low_pfn == cc->zone->zone_start_pfn) &&
> !fast_find_block && !isolation_suitable(cc, page))
> continue;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-31 17:24 Johannes Weiner
2023-07-31 20:25 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-08-01 9:08 ` Mel Gorman
2023-08-01 11:03 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e445d60-e8b1-7172-4577-20e7f28d1e9d@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox