linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	ziy@nvidia.com, willy@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	hughd@google.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] xas_reload() in iter_xarray_populate_pages()
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 09:40:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8da60934-0670-4f8a-8bde-fa4de320cdbb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250526063524.22597-1-dev.jain@arm.com>

On 26.05.25 08:35, Dev Jain wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> After doing an xas_load() and xas_retry(), we take neither a reference nor a lock
> on the folio, and we do an xas_reload(). Is this just to reduce the time window
> for a race?
> 
> If the above is true, then, there is a negligible window between xas_load() and
> xas_reload(), because only xas_retry() exists between them, so why to even reload()?

The usual sequence for the pagecache is (see filemap_get_entry())

1) xas_load(): Load the entry

2) xas_retry(): Test if we have to retry immediately

3) folio || xa_is_value(folio): check if the entry stores a folio

4) folio_try_get(): try getting a folio reference, might get freed
    concurrently, so a folio_get() is not safe

5) folio != xas_reload(&xas): recheck whether the entry was changed
    concurrently

iter_xarray_get_pages()->iter_xarray_populate_pages() works on whatever 
xarray was provided to iov_iter_xarray().

erofs/netfs/orangefs seem to pass the pagecache ... so I would also 
assume that we have to use the same sequence as above.

Willy and me had a look ad that code in b57f4f4f186d ("iov_iter: convert 
iter_xarray_populate_pages() to use folios").

But looking at it now, I think that code is incorrect. At least the 
folio_get() and reload-before-folio-get is weird.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-26  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-26  6:35 Dev Jain
2025-05-26  7:40 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-05-26 19:20   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-06-17  5:10 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-17  7:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17  9:18     ` Dev Jain
2025-06-17  9:26       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17  9:38         ` Dev Jain
2025-06-17 13:47   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-06-18  3:14     ` Dev Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8da60934-0670-4f8a-8bde-fa4de320cdbb@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox