From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
ziy@nvidia.com, willy@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
hughd@google.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] xas_reload() in iter_xarray_populate_pages()
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 09:40:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8da60934-0670-4f8a-8bde-fa4de320cdbb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250526063524.22597-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
On 26.05.25 08:35, Dev Jain wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> After doing an xas_load() and xas_retry(), we take neither a reference nor a lock
> on the folio, and we do an xas_reload(). Is this just to reduce the time window
> for a race?
>
> If the above is true, then, there is a negligible window between xas_load() and
> xas_reload(), because only xas_retry() exists between them, so why to even reload()?
The usual sequence for the pagecache is (see filemap_get_entry())
1) xas_load(): Load the entry
2) xas_retry(): Test if we have to retry immediately
3) folio || xa_is_value(folio): check if the entry stores a folio
4) folio_try_get(): try getting a folio reference, might get freed
concurrently, so a folio_get() is not safe
5) folio != xas_reload(&xas): recheck whether the entry was changed
concurrently
iter_xarray_get_pages()->iter_xarray_populate_pages() works on whatever
xarray was provided to iov_iter_xarray().
erofs/netfs/orangefs seem to pass the pagecache ... so I would also
assume that we have to use the same sequence as above.
Willy and me had a look ad that code in b57f4f4f186d ("iov_iter: convert
iter_xarray_populate_pages() to use folios").
But looking at it now, I think that code is incorrect. At least the
folio_get() and reload-before-folio-get is weird.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-26 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-26 6:35 Dev Jain
2025-05-26 7:40 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-05-26 19:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-06-17 5:10 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-17 7:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 9:18 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-17 9:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 9:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-17 13:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-06-18 3:14 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8da60934-0670-4f8a-8bde-fa4de320cdbb@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox