linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/memcg: Avoid reclaiming below hard protection
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:53:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d8e860d-f9a4-6708-ccab-d47180f0ad0a@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181203115736.GQ31738@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 2018/12/3 PM 7:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 03-12-18 16:01:19, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>> When memcgs get reclaimed after its usage exceeds min, some
>> usages below the min may also be reclaimed in the current
>> implementation, the amount is considerably large during kswapd
>> reclaim according to my ftrace results.
> 
> And here again. Describe the setup and the behavior please?
> 

step 1
mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/online
cd /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/online
echo 512M > memory.max
echo 409600000 > memory.min
echo $$ > tasks
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null


while true; do sleep 1; cat memory.current ; cat memory.min; done


step 2
create global memory pressure by allocating annoymous and cached
pages to constantly trigger kswap: dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null

step 3
Then observe "online" groups, hundreds of kbytes a little over
memory.min can cause tens of MiB to be reclaimed by kswapd.

Here is one of test results I got:
cat memory.current; cat memory.min; echo;
409485312   // current
409600000   // min

385052672   // See current got over reclaimed for 23MB
409600000   // min

Its corresponding ftrace output I monitored:
kswapd_0-281   [000] ....   304.706632: shrink_node_memcg:
min_excess=24, nr_reclaimed=6013, sc->nr_to_reclaim=1499997, exceeds
5989pages

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-04  2:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-03  8:01 [PATCH 1/3] mm/memcg: Fix min/low usage in propagate_protected_usage() Xunlei Pang
2018-12-03  8:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/vmscan: Enable kswapd to reclaim low-protected memory Xunlei Pang
2018-12-03 11:56   ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-03 15:20     ` Xunlei Pang
2018-12-03 17:22       ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-04  2:40         ` Xunlei Pang
2018-12-04  7:25           ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-04  8:44             ` Xunlei Pang
2018-12-03  8:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/memcg: Avoid reclaiming below hard protection Xunlei Pang
2018-12-03 11:57   ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-04  2:53     ` Xunlei Pang [this message]
2018-12-03 11:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/memcg: Fix min/low usage in propagate_protected_usage() Michal Hocko
2018-12-03 14:49   ` Xunlei Pang
2018-12-03 18:00 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-12-05  8:58   ` Xunlei Pang
2018-12-05 23:11     ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d8e860d-f9a4-6708-ccab-d47180f0ad0a@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox