From: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
<willy@infradead.org>, <ackerleytng@google.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] readahead: Correct the start and size in ondemand_readahead()
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 10:59:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d35bbf9-5843-39be-c429-3c43108520d3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230627050702.823033-1-fengwei.yin@intel.com>
On 6/27/23 13:07, Yin Fengwei wrote:
> The commit
> 9425c591e06a ("page cache: fix page_cache_next/prev_miss off by one")
> updated the page_cache_next_miss() to return the index beyond
> range.
>
> But it breaks the start/size of ra in ondemand_readahead() because
> the offset by one is accumulated to readahead_index. As a consequence,
> not best readahead order is picked.
>
> Tracing of the order parameter of filemap_alloc_folio() showed:
> page order : count distribution
> 0 : 892073 | |
> 1 : 0 | |
> 2 : 65120457 |****************************************|
> 3 : 32914005 |******************** |
> 4 : 33020991 |******************** |
> with 9425c591e06a9.
>
> With parent commit:
> page order : count distribution
> 0 : 3417288 |**** |
> 1 : 0 | |
> 2 : 877012 |* |
> 3 : 288 | |
> 4 : 5607522 |******* |
> 5 : 29974228 |****************************************|
>
> Fix the issue by set correct start/size of ra in ondemand_readahead().
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202306211346.1e9ff03e-oliver.sang@intel.com
> Fixes: 9425c591e06a ("page cache: fix page_cache_next/prev_miss off by one")
> Signed-off-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
> ---
> mm/readahead.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
> index 47afbca1d122e..a1b8c628851a9 100644
> --- a/mm/readahead.c
> +++ b/mm/readahead.c
> @@ -614,11 +614,11 @@ static void ondemand_readahead(struct readahead_control *ractl,
> max_pages);
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> - if (!start || start - index > max_pages)
> + if (!start || start - index - 1 > max_pages)
> return;
The offset by one only happens when no gaps in the range. So this patch need an update.
I will send out v2 soon. Thanks.
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
>
> - ra->start = start;
> - ra->size = start - index; /* old async_size */
> + ra->start = start - 1;
> + ra->size = start - index - 1; /* old async_size */
> ra->size += req_size;
> ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max_pages);
> ra->async_size = ra->size;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-28 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-27 5:07 Yin Fengwei
2023-06-28 2:59 ` Yin Fengwei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d35bbf9-5843-39be-c429-3c43108520d3@intel.com \
--to=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox