From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-new v8 2/4] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:20:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d2e809c-e4c8-4d35-a2ae-62777b6dfbcc@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cf94628-3c6a-43ed-9fc1-29bd5a911497@kernel.org>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 04:17:21PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 3/25/26 16:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:10:23 +0000 "Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" <ljs@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> >>> No need to update the patch description.
> >>
> >> I will take a look at this (sorry for delay) but general point - while
> >> fix-patches are convenient, they're incredibly anti-reviewer.
>
> +1, I could have sworn we brought that up before. :)
>
> >>
> >> I hope at some point in the future we can move away from that so you can look at
> >> a series on list and know that what's shown there is the actual patch.
> >
> > Oh. I've never really received that message, at least not at all
> > clearly.
> >
> > I've been hoping that the -fix patches are actually pro-reviewer, for
> > those reviewers who have looked at the previous version. A full resend
> > of something you've already looked at is quite annoying!
> >
> > I try to mitigate that by sending the
> > heres-what-you-changed-since-last-time replies. It's a little more
> > work at this end, but that's not at all a problem.
> >
> > I see a couple of options here
> >
> > a) I can fold the -fix into the base patch then send out the
> > resulting diff as a reply-to-all.
> >
> > b) We can just deprecate the -fix things and ask people for full
> > resends.
> >
> > It depends on what people prefer. How do we determine that?
>
> I like "fix" for smaller "obvious" stuff where a resend is really just
> noise.
>
> But for bigger stuff I prefer a full resend (we can still have these
> temporary fixups, but for reviewers a follow-up resend is better).
Yeah, it's really about being able to come to a series later and be able to
comment line-by-line.
Really larger stuff should be resent I think, esp. if there's multiple
fixes in the series.
A reply with the same-patch-but-with-fix-applied would definitely be
useful!
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David
Thanks, Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-21 9:39 [PATCH mm-new v8 0/4] Improve khugepaged scan logic Vernon Yang
2026-02-21 9:39 ` [PATCH mm-new v8 1/4] mm: khugepaged: add trace_mm_khugepaged_scan event Vernon Yang
2026-03-25 14:06 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-02-21 9:39 ` [PATCH mm-new v8 2/4] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number Vernon Yang
2026-02-24 3:52 ` Wei Yang
2026-02-25 14:25 ` Vernon Yang
2026-02-25 14:29 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-26 14:31 ` Vernon Yang
2026-02-26 15:45 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-26 17:15 ` Vernon Yang
2026-03-25 14:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-25 14:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-25 15:09 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-25 15:17 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-25 15:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) [this message]
2026-03-25 15:22 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-25 16:17 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-25 16:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-25 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-25 18:53 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-25 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-25 20:03 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-25 20:16 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-25 20:49 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-25 17:00 ` Vernon Yang
2026-03-25 17:08 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-25 18:59 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-25 19:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-26 1:59 ` Vernon Yang
2026-03-26 8:03 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-02-21 9:39 ` [PATCH mm-new v8 3/4] mm: add folio_test_lazyfree helper Vernon Yang
2026-02-21 9:39 ` [PATCH mm-new v8 4/4] mm: khugepaged: skip lazy-free folios Vernon Yang
2026-02-21 10:27 ` Barry Song
2026-02-21 13:38 ` Vernon Yang
2026-02-23 13:16 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-23 20:08 ` Barry Song
2026-02-24 10:10 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-23 20:10 ` Barry Song
2026-02-26 7:55 ` Vernon Yang
2026-03-16 19:41 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-17 2:16 ` Vernon Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d2e809c-e4c8-4d35-a2ae-62777b6dfbcc@lucifer.local \
--to=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
--cc=yanglincheng@kylinos.cn \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox