From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
alyssa@rosenzweig.io, asahi@lists.linux.dev,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, david@redhat.com,
dwmw2@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, heiko@sntech.de,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, joro@8bytes.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com,
marcan@marcan.st, mhiramat@kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
paulmck@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, samuel@sholland.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, sven@svenpeter.dev,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org,
tomas.mudrunka@gmail.com, vdumpa@nvidia.com, wens@csie.org,
will@kernel.org, yu-cheng.yu@intel.com, rientjes@google.com,
bagasdotme@gmail.com, mkoutny@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] iommu/vt-d: add wrapper functions for page allocations
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 13:44:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ce2cd7b-7702-45aa-b4c8-25a01c27ed83@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240207174102.1486130-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
On 2024-02-07 5:40 pm, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
[...]> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-pages.h
b/drivers/iommu/iommu-pages.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c412d0aaa399
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-pages.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024, Google LLC.
> + * Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __IOMMU_PAGES_H
> +#define __IOMMU_PAGES_H
> +
> +#include <linux/vmstat.h>
> +#include <linux/gfp.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * All page allocation that are performed in the IOMMU subsystem must use one of
"All page allocations" is too broad; As before, this is only about
pagetable allocations, or I guess for the full nuance, allocations of
pagetables and other per-iommu_domain configuration structures which are
reasonable to report as "pagetables" to userspace.
> + * the functions below. This is necessary for the proper accounting as IOMMU
> + * state can be rather large, i.e. multiple gigabytes in size.
> + */
> +
> +/**
> + * __iommu_alloc_pages_node - allocate a zeroed page of a given order from
> + * specific NUMA node.
> + * @nid: memory NUMA node id
> + * @gfp: buddy allocator flags
> + * @order: page order
> + *
> + * returns the head struct page of the allocated page.
> + */
> +static inline struct page *__iommu_alloc_pages_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp,
> + int order)
> +{
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + page = alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp | __GFP_ZERO, order);
> + if (unlikely(!page))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return page;
> +}
All 3 invocations of this only use the returned struct page to trivially
derive page_address(), so we really don't need it; just clean up these
callsites a bit more.
> +
> +/**
> + * __iommu_alloc_pages - allocate a zeroed page of a given order.
> + * @gfp: buddy allocator flags
> + * @order: page order
> + *
> + * returns the head struct page of the allocated page.
> + */
> +static inline struct page *__iommu_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int order)
> +{
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + page = alloc_pages(gfp | __GFP_ZERO, order);
> + if (unlikely(!page))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return page;
> +}
Same for the single invocation of this one.
> +
> +/**
> + * __iommu_alloc_page_node - allocate a zeroed page at specific NUMA node.
> + * @nid: memory NUMA node id
> + * @gfp: buddy allocator flags
> + *
> + * returns the struct page of the allocated page.
> + */
> +static inline struct page *__iommu_alloc_page_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + return __iommu_alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp, 0);
> +}
There are no users of this at all.
> +
> +/**
> + * __iommu_alloc_page - allocate a zeroed page
> + * @gfp: buddy allocator flags
> + *
> + * returns the struct page of the allocated page.
> + */
> +static inline struct page *__iommu_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + return __iommu_alloc_pages(gfp, 0);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __iommu_free_pages - free page of a given order
> + * @page: head struct page of the page
> + * @order: page order
> + */
> +static inline void __iommu_free_pages(struct page *page, int order)
> +{
> + if (!page)
> + return;
> +
> + __free_pages(page, order);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __iommu_free_page - free page
> + * @page: struct page of the page
> + */
> +static inline void __iommu_free_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> + __iommu_free_pages(page, 0);
> +}
Beyond one more trivial Intel cleanup for __iommu_alloc_pages(), these 3
are then only used by tegra-smmu, so honestly I'd be inclined to just
open-code there page_address()/virt_to_page() conversions as appropriate
there (once again I think the whole thing could in fact be refactored to
not use struct pages at all because all it's ever ultimately doing with
them is page_address(), but that would be a bigger job so definitely
out-of-scope for this series).
> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_alloc_pages_node - allocate a zeroed page of a given order from
> + * specific NUMA node.
> + * @nid: memory NUMA node id
> + * @gfp: buddy allocator flags
> + * @order: page order
> + *
> + * returns the virtual address of the allocated page
> + */
> +static inline void *iommu_alloc_pages_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp, int order)
> +{
> + struct page *page = __iommu_alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp, order);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!page))
> + return NULL;
As a general point I'd prefer to fold these checks into the accounting
function itself rather than repeat them all over.
> +
> + return page_address(page);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_alloc_pages - allocate a zeroed page of a given order
> + * @gfp: buddy allocator flags
> + * @order: page order
> + *
> + * returns the virtual address of the allocated page
> + */
> +static inline void *iommu_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int order)
> +{
> + struct page *page = __iommu_alloc_pages(gfp, order);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!page))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return page_address(page);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_alloc_page_node - allocate a zeroed page at specific NUMA node.
> + * @nid: memory NUMA node id
> + * @gfp: buddy allocator flags
> + *
> + * returns the virtual address of the allocated page
> + */
> +static inline void *iommu_alloc_page_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + return iommu_alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp, 0);
> +}
TBH I'm not entirely convinced that saving 4 characters per invocation
times 11 invocations makes this wrapper worthwhile :/
> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_alloc_page - allocate a zeroed page
> + * @gfp: buddy allocator flags
> + *
> + * returns the virtual address of the allocated page
> + */
> +static inline void *iommu_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + return iommu_alloc_pages(gfp, 0);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_free_pages - free page of a given order
> + * @virt: virtual address of the page to be freed.
> + * @order: page order
> + */
> +static inline void iommu_free_pages(void *virt, int order)
> +{
> + if (!virt)
> + return;
> +
> + __iommu_free_pages(virt_to_page(virt), order);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_free_page - free page
> + * @virt: virtual address of the page to be freed.
> + */
> +static inline void iommu_free_page(void *virt)
> +{
> + iommu_free_pages(virt, 0);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_free_pages_list - free a list of pages.
> + * @page: the head of the lru list to be freed.
> + *
> + * There are no locking requirement for these pages, as they are going to be
> + * put on a free list as soon as refcount reaches 0. Pages are put on this LRU
> + * list once they are removed from the IOMMU page tables. However, they can
> + * still be access through debugfs.
> + */
> +static inline void iommu_free_pages_list(struct list_head *page)
Nit: I'd be inclined to call this iommu_put_pages_list for consistency.
> +{
> + while (!list_empty(page)) {
> + struct page *p = list_entry(page->prev, struct page, lru);
> +
> + list_del(&p->lru);
> + put_page(p);
> + }
> +}
I realise now you've also missed the common freelist freeing sites in
iommu-dma.
Thanks,
Robin.
> +
> +#endif /* __IOMMU_PAGES_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 17:40 [PATCH v4 00/10] IOMMU memory observability Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] iommu/vt-d: add wrapper functions for page allocations Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-09 13:44 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2024-02-10 2:21 ` Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-13 17:26 ` Robin Murphy
2024-02-16 1:05 ` Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] iommu/amd: use page allocation function provided by iommu-pages.h Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: " Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] iommu/io-pgtable-dart: " Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] iommu/exynos: " Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-09 11:26 ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-02-09 19:00 ` Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] iommu/rockchip: " Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] iommu/sun50i: " Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-09 10:55 ` Jernej Škrabec
2024-02-09 19:01 ` Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-07 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] iommu/tegra-smmu: " Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-07 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] iommu: observability of the IOMMU allocations Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-09 11:17 ` Robin Murphy
2024-02-07 17:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] iommu: account IOMMU allocated memory Pasha Tatashin
2024-02-09 10:50 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] IOMMU memory observability Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ce2cd7b-7702-45aa-b4c8-25a01c27ed83@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
--cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=marcan@marcan.st \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=sven@svenpeter.dev \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tomas.mudrunka@gmail.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox