From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-f200.google.com (mail-pf1-f200.google.com [209.85.210.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EC38E00F9 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 05:49:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf1-f200.google.com with SMTP id p15so38882731pfk.7 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 02:49:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (www262.sakura.ne.jp. [202.181.97.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d9si53687655pgv.123.2019.01.05.02.49.22 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Jan 2019 02:49:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: INFO: rcu detected stall in ndisc_alloc_skb From: Tetsuo Handa References: <0000000000007beca9057e4c8c14@google.com> Message-ID: <8cdbcb63-d2f7-cace-0eda-d73255fd47e7@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:49:11 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: syzbot , David Miller , Alexey Kuznetsov , LKML , netdev , syzkaller-bugs , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Linux-MM On 2019/01/03 2:06, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2018/12/31 17:24, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>> Since this involves OOMs and looks like a one-off induced memory corruption: >>>> >>>> #syz dup: kernel panic: corrupted stack end in wb_workfn >>>> >>> >>> Why? >>> >>> RCU stall in this case is likely to be latency caused by flooding of printk(). >> >> Just a hypothesis. OOMs lead to arbitrary memory corruptions, so can >> cause stalls as well. But can be what you said too. I just thought >> that cleaner dashboard is more useful than a large assorted pile of >> crashes. If you think it's actionable in some way, feel free to undup. >> > > We don't know why bpf tree is hitting this problem. > Let's continue monitoring this problem. > > #syz undup > A report at 2019/01/05 10:08 from "no output from test machine (2)" ( https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=1700726f400000 ) says that there are flood of memory allocation failure messages. Since continuous memory allocation failure messages itself is not recognized as a crash, we might be misunderstanding that this problem is not occurring recently. It will be nice if we can run testcases which are executed on bpf-next tree.