Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: use helper huge_page_size() to get hugepage size

[Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>]

On 2021/2/9 9:36, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 2/8/21 5:24 PM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> Hi：
>> On 2021/2/9 8:45, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>> On 2/8/21 12:24 AM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>> We can use helper huge_page_size() to get the hugepage size directly to
>>>> simplify the code slightly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  mm/hugetlb.c | 14 ++++++--------
>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>>>> index 18628f8dbfb0..6cdb59d8f663 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>>>> @@ -3199,7 +3199,7 @@ void __init hugetlb_add_hstate(unsigned int order)
>>>>  	BUG_ON(order == 0);
>>>>  	h = &hstates[hugetlb_max_hstate++];
>>>>  	h->order = order;
>>>> -	h->mask = ~((1ULL << (order + PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1);
>>>> +	h->mask = ~(huge_page_size(h) - 1);
>>>>  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; ++i)
>>>>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->hugepage_freelists[i]);
>>>>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->hugepage_activelist);
>>>> @@ -3474,7 +3474,7 @@ void hugetlb_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m)
>>>>  	for_each_hstate(h) {
>>>>  		unsigned long count = h->nr_huge_pages;
>>>>  
>>>> -		total += (PAGE_SIZE << huge_page_order(h)) * count;
>>>> +		total += huge_page_size(h) * count;
>>>>  
>>>>  		if (h == &default_hstate)
>>>>  			seq_printf(m,
>>>> @@ -3487,10 +3487,10 @@ void hugetlb_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m)
>>>>  				   h->free_huge_pages,
>>>>  				   h->resv_huge_pages,
>>>>  				   h->surplus_huge_pages,
>>>> -				   (PAGE_SIZE << huge_page_order(h)) / 1024);
>>>> +				   huge_page_size(h) / SZ_1K);
>>>>  	}
>>>>  
>>>> -	seq_printf(m, "Hugetlb:        %8lu kB\n", total / 1024);
>>>> +	seq_printf(m, "Hugetlb:        %8lu kB\n", total / SZ_1K);
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>>  int hugetlb_report_node_meminfo(char *buf, int len, int nid)
>>>> @@ -3524,7 +3524,7 @@ void hugetlb_show_meminfo(void)
>>>>  				h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid],
>>>>  				h->free_huge_pages_node[nid],
>>>>  				h->surplus_huge_pages_node[nid],
>>>> -				1UL << (huge_page_order(h) + PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
>>>> +				huge_page_size(h) >> 10);
>>>
>>> Should we change this to
>>>
>>> 				huge_page_size(h) / SZ_1K);
>>>> as in hugetlb_report_meminfo above?  Or, is that one where it takes an
>>> additional instruction to do the divide as opposed to the shift?  I would> rather add the instruction and keep everything consistent.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, it takes an additional instruction to do the divide as opposed to the shift. So I did not
>> change this. But it seems keeping everything consistent in a function is more important. So should
>> I send a V2 to change this or Andrew would kindly handle this ?
> 
> I would go ahead and put together a v2 and let Andrew decide how he wants
> to handle it.  You can include,
> 

Will do. Thanks a lot.

> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> 
> Thanks
>