From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16099C7115C for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id AC0418D0007; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 06:43:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A47EC8D0001; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 06:43:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 8E9848D0007; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 06:43:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782D28D0001 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 06:43:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262D81201CB for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:43:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83593586202.14.2B60F2F Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8FC40002 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=hxOASJb8; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1750848198; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=7wW3ih43Zkg0TrQnyQrXW+/utZS1vGpcCPu8p34xLqE=; b=6QLBT9vW+12Q/uBLU6tw9AIGd1GpWjLiZbRqz1C/Zh+UY3Z5ogd3UD7+EB+Qg23+uOSap1 GlvnxYsd1r2etK/mdSYXniqlHELJ0LHY/lUGDobMM+jwFJvYQkwbedjn7jNrS4Wsc6mqt2 sB37hWfjCbc/e9Knq/GUjv5ZM5Dnc7A= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=hxOASJb8; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1750848198; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KunFpQRTaga2JNIf0+88iFxLXIw5RMeFlugDmGSyI09ow6mxKLZj7nl6cW0o+ijnM+/I0u 7xNQRFg3as9LDEuHqivRP2FdaHI7OiG0WKHDp+Qw/pehp3YmB/xXFXyuynNq2VvNpirMjk N67uagI/iPwpnoF0DuakVT76DjOT9qM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1750848198; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=7wW3ih43Zkg0TrQnyQrXW+/utZS1vGpcCPu8p34xLqE=; b=hxOASJb8VTr2m68IrF3XY68ExH66RB58XZxe2EpceJ7SotJW0rZMngJYV6B1ijRJjoo/xN I+KJT0XLdx/cAN5y7CwgsHD2CFNvNofdAP2zvJTOrJZzHb8mRkNtgAL+3b1m1Pf6eedDlm ybPoLsjhnNeNYhA+GKE7607XBoESlGk= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-312-a_8ssnRpOEKtJoW4k8bJBg-1; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 06:43:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: a_8ssnRpOEKtJoW4k8bJBg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: a_8ssnRpOEKtJoW4k8bJBg_1750848196 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-451ac1b43c4so7946295e9.0 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 03:43:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750848195; x=1751452995; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7wW3ih43Zkg0TrQnyQrXW+/utZS1vGpcCPu8p34xLqE=; b=P3S2E+VMxlCRZF2kMweUnXV8XiXLJPeNRMC7nIlQqcsoTqVUHjegh1N03wHmHf5Z0l OnVp1/+Px21dnJvfIdBRZNo/tbdIFQeOAjLLXFwJKc7DYl5raH0xyARNJf6S1/Uc7FYn cTeqjCQqtgwuyCcLE+cn0eicGKrfRUaHxENOJhnvqB3NUHr9tCY4cnj5cUO7Ny+7z1Qe ImqtKnLcToy/7N+Ok3pbeFbNW6FITG4b/yeGBGaVa+1wDrWeC5QuEOD2UMCCfQhgjzox 9DRq+1DLcW7VzBCjThwDD2FBoNvXFkADqed4lSOhhodYjM/FSiEC5lrJ6eOvuDaUdEBQ jk7w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXa2YXq7D/2UgyPb0h7Mo7eTwXJLPJJRnDTIV1QSk3SAsCq9EPmRkoWjt/SLa70MTncZtJTcFuJIg==@kvack.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx4RujlkbWbIo2iY1c+OBaXBr5J8irvopQShApVj9SmIApKraR0 OSctQ8Um6M9HveV9mgbG/5/LUsrkLgRKbzPBO9gBmnzsmlg/5IMZ4wkoAPfz/ew93TH4gL5H3/6 BhlZH4GPJz67kdWDrrBqCtK/LWkJVuVvSxQ2tRpEg8u/eSuU6x8zE X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvGdEB86LQhtl2V7grvsLZW9sn7nvEl/g30wSUz7qWrYGNaqL+O0Pegyex1rO8 QGfG6+t5nZ4A4uTKgee62SZpBXh0NFM726uqrk0yAfmImuiPnxWYXLg5w1mzQAlZV7Qru0J1Hxf zFrHhkoYkRiyFfhQp0i6u+Zp/ixtu1pzeKfA4MC51+WxevUWcV07oAt5a3LQwhLr5To9oR8kyt+ j3iNAlX8sLd/BHxMnDVRsxuC8BAQbyiGxwX3T0tjfHap21uON7KjI4ncXDUZu2J15vLTw3fTci8 yDxXTybGCFZcCEjRoSzQrhhcNkepjJszH90XosBmOKhx7st62Fa7oHyZYq+JFbJsapq/RKkXF+e wgVzpu0ad57UQ+QsM4DRC0IEVgYG/aj2FuxgVS5f5zAb4 X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:474a:b0:453:697:6f30 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45381b07d29mr21022055e9.32.1750848195493; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 03:43:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEJljRaaE6OC4rRCVonHRouMFPZISpAsnH2B0GX4btvGwNOgtTJgjBDvu5UhEfZJTGDSELZjQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:474a:b0:453:697:6f30 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45381b07d29mr21021765e9.32.1750848195088; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 03:43:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:d8:2f12:1b00:5d6b:db26:e2b7:12? (p200300d82f121b005d6bdb26e2b70012.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:d8:2f12:1b00:5d6b:db26:e2b7:12]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4538237ac2csm15646965e9.38.2025.06.25.03.43.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Jun 2025 03:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a157228-0b7e-479d-a224-ec85b458ea75@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 12:43:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: Support batched unmap for lazyfree large folios during reclamation To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Cc: Lance Yang , akpm@linux-foundation.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, chrisl@kernel.org, kasong@tencent.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com, x86@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, zhengtangquan@oppo.com References: <2c19a6cf-0b42-477b-a672-ed8c1edd4267@redhat.com> <20250624162503.78957-1-ioworker0@gmail.com> <27d174e0-c209-4851-825a-0baeb56df86f@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: YMFo3HAB3V6OEMnuGtUakx7nGDhyA8oT4Vb-60ceArA_1750848196 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AE8FC40002 X-Stat-Signature: rih7swy73ccf1j88rbw3k9fcjxwjn757 X-HE-Tag: 1750848198-493262 X-HE-Meta: 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 ftrT6hox 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 25.06.25 12:38, Barry Song wrote: >>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c >>> index fb63d9256f09..241d55a92a47 100644 >>> --- a/mm/rmap.c >>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c >>> @@ -1847,12 +1847,25 @@ void folio_remove_rmap_pud(struct folio *folio, struct page *page, >>> >>> /* We support batch unmapping of PTEs for lazyfree large folios */ >>> static inline bool can_batch_unmap_folio_ptes(unsigned long addr, >>> - struct folio *folio, pte_t *ptep) >>> + struct folio *folio, pte_t *ptep, >>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma) >>> { >>> const fpb_t fpb_flags = FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY | FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY; >>> + unsigned long next_pmd, vma_end, end_addr; >>> int max_nr = folio_nr_pages(folio); >>> pte_t pte = ptep_get(ptep); >>> >>> + /* >>> + * Limit the batch scan within a single VMA and within a single >>> + * page table. >>> + */ >>> + vma_end = vma->vm_end; >>> + next_pmd = ALIGN(addr + 1, PMD_SIZE); >>> + end_addr = addr + (unsigned long)max_nr * PAGE_SIZE; >>> + >>> + if (end_addr > min(next_pmd, vma_end)) >>> + return false; >> >> May I suggest that we clean all that up as we fix it? >> >> Maybe something like this: >> >> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c >> index 3b74bb19c11dd..11fbddc6ad8d6 100644 >> --- a/mm/rmap.c >> +++ b/mm/rmap.c >> @@ -1845,23 +1845,38 @@ void folio_remove_rmap_pud(struct folio *folio, struct page *page, >> #endif >> } >> >> -/* We support batch unmapping of PTEs for lazyfree large folios */ >> -static inline bool can_batch_unmap_folio_ptes(unsigned long addr, >> - struct folio *folio, pte_t *ptep) >> +static inline unsigned int folio_unmap_pte_batch(struct folio *folio, >> + struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, enum ttu_flags flags, >> + pte_t pte) >> { >> const fpb_t fpb_flags = FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY | FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY; >> - int max_nr = folio_nr_pages(folio); >> - pte_t pte = ptep_get(ptep); >> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = pvmw->vma; >> + unsigned long end_addr, addr = pvmw->address; >> + unsigned int max_nr; >> + >> + if (flags & TTU_HWPOISON) >> + return 1; >> + if (!folio_test_large(folio)) >> + return 1; >> + >> + /* We may only batch within a single VMA and a single page table. */ >> + end_addr = min_t(unsigned long, ALIGN(addr + 1, PMD_SIZE), vma->vm_end); > > Is this pmd_addr_end()? > Yes, that could be reused as well here. >> + max_nr = (end_addr - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT; >> >> + /* We only support lazyfree batching for now ... */ >> if (!folio_test_anon(folio) || folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) >> - return false; >> + return 1; >> if (pte_unused(pte)) >> - return false; >> - if (pte_pfn(pte) != folio_pfn(folio)) >> - return false; >> + return 1; >> + /* ... where we must be able to batch the whole folio. */ >> + if (pte_pfn(pte) != folio_pfn(folio) || max_nr != folio_nr_pages(folio)) >> + return 1; >> + max_nr = folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, pvmw->pte, pte, max_nr, fpb_flags, >> + NULL, NULL, NULL); >> >> - return folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, ptep, pte, max_nr, fpb_flags, NULL, >> - NULL, NULL) == max_nr; >> + if (max_nr != folio_nr_pages(folio)) >> + return 1; >> + return max_nr; >> } >> >> /* >> @@ -2024,9 +2039,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma, >> if (pte_dirty(pteval)) >> folio_mark_dirty(folio); >> } else if (likely(pte_present(pteval))) { >> - if (folio_test_large(folio) && !(flags & TTU_HWPOISON) && >> - can_batch_unmap_folio_ptes(address, folio, pvmw.pte)) >> - nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio); >> + nr_pages = folio_unmap_pte_batch(folio, &pvmw, flags, pteval); >> end_addr = address + nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE; >> flush_cache_range(vma, address, end_addr); >> >> >> Note that I don't quite understand why we have to batch the whole thing or fallback to >> individual pages. Why can't we perform other batches that span only some PTEs? What's special >> about 1 PTE vs. 2 PTEs vs. all PTEs? >> >> >> Can someone enlighten me why that is required? > > It's probably not a strict requirement — I thought cases where the > count is greater than 1 but less than nr_pages might not provide much > practical benefit, except perhaps in very rare edge cases, since > madv_free() already calls split_folio(). Okay, but it makes the code more complicated. If there is no reason to prevent the batching, we should drop it. > > if (folio_test_large(folio)) { > bool any_young, any_dirty; > nr = madvise_folio_pte_batch(addr, end, folio, pte, > ptent, > &any_young, &any_dirty); > > > if (nr < folio_nr_pages(folio)) { > ... > err = split_folio(folio); > ... > } > } > > Another reason is that when we extend this to non-lazyfree anonymous > folios [1], things get complicated: checking anon_exclusive and updating > folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte with the number of PTEs becomes tricky if > a folio is partially exclusive and partially shared. Right, but that's just another limitation on top how much we can batch, right? -- Cheers, David / dhildenb