From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
Nic Losby <blurbdust@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: check for pgoff value overflow
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 09:35:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a0863a2-1890-11e0-1fc2-c96e1794e809@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180307235923.12469-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Hi Mike,
On 2018/3/8 7:59, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> A vma with vm_pgoff large enough to overflow a loff_t type when
> converted to a byte offset can be passed via the remap_file_pages
> system call. The hugetlbfs mmap routine uses the byte offset to
> calculate reservations and file size.
>
> A sequence such as:
> mmap(0x20a00000, 0x600000, 0, 0x66033, -1, 0);
> remap_file_pages(0x20a00000, 0x600000, 0, 0x20000000000000, 0);
> will result in the following when task exits/file closed,
> kernel BUG at mm/hugetlb.c:749!
> Call Trace:
> hugetlbfs_evict_inode+0x2f/0x40
> evict+0xcb/0x190
> __dentry_kill+0xcb/0x150
> __fput+0x164/0x1e0
> task_work_run+0x84/0xa0
> exit_to_usermode_loop+0x7d/0x80
> do_syscall_64+0x18b/0x190
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
>
> The overflowed pgoff value causes hugetlbfs to try to set up a
> mapping with a negative range (end < start) that leaves invalid
> state which causes the BUG.
>
> Reported-by: Nic Losby <blurbdust@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> index 8fe1b0aa2896..cb288dec5564 100644
> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> @@ -127,12 +127,13 @@ static int hugetlbfs_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> vma->vm_ops = &hugetlb_vm_ops;
>
> /*
> - * Offset passed to mmap (before page shift) could have been
> - * negative when represented as a (l)off_t.
> + * page based offset in vm_pgoff could be sufficiently large to
> + * overflow a (l)off_t when converted to byte offset.
> */
> - if (((loff_t)vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) < 0)
> + if (vma->vm_pgoff && ((loff_t)vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) <= 0)
> return -EINVAL;
This seems still no the right fix, taking the following case as an example:
mmap(0x20a00000, 0x600000, 0, 0x66033, -1, 0);
remap_file_pages(0x20a00000, 0x600000, 0, 0x0020001000000000, 0);
You should just check the highest PAGE_SHIFT+1 bits of pgoff in you want check
at this point, right?
However, region_chg makes me a litter puzzle that when its return value < 0, sometime
adds_in_progress is added like this case, while sometime it is not. so why not just
change at the beginning of region_chg ?
if (f > t)
return -EINVAL;
Thanks
Yisheng
>
> + /* must be huge page aligned */
> if (vma->vm_pgoff & (~huge_page_mask(h) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> return -EINVAL;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-08 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-199037-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2018-03-06 21:31 ` [Bug 199037] New: Kernel bug at mm/hugetlb.c:741 Andrew Morton
2018-03-06 21:46 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-03-07 0:31 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-03-07 2:49 ` Nic Losby
2018-03-07 4:19 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-03-07 16:39 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-03-07 23:59 ` [PATCH] hugetlbfs: check for pgoff value overflow Mike Kravetz
2018-03-08 0:57 ` Nic Losby
2018-03-08 1:35 ` Yisheng Xie [this message]
2018-03-08 4:25 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-03-08 21:03 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-03-08 21:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Kravetz
2018-03-08 22:15 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-08 23:37 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-03-08 23:53 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-09 0:27 ` [PATCH v3] " Mike Kravetz
2018-03-09 1:05 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-16 10:17 ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-16 16:19 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-03-16 16:53 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a0863a2-1890-11e0-1fc2-c96e1794e809@huawei.com \
--to=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=blurbdust@gmail.com \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox