Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] percpu: add PERCPU_ATOM_SIZE for a generic percpu area setup

[Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>]

On Nov 3, 2015, at 1:10 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:

Dear Christoph,

> On Sun, 1 Nov 2015, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> 
>> There is no room to adjust 'atom_size' now when a generic percpu area
>> is used. It would be redundant to write down an architecture-specific
>> setup_per_cpu_areas() in order to only change the 'atom_size'. Thus,
>> this patch adds a new definition, PERCPU_ATOM_SIZE, which is PAGE_SIZE
>> by default. The value could be updated if needed by architecture.
> 
> What is atom_size? Why would you want a difference allocation size here?
> The percpu area is virtually mapped regardless. So you will have
> contiguous addresses even without atom_size.

I think Catalin have already written down a perfect explanation. I'd like
memory with an alignment greater than PAGE_SIZE. But, __per_cpu_offset[]
is PAGE_SIZE aligned under a generic setup_per_cpu_areas(). That is,
secondary cores cannot get that kind of space.

Thanks for taking a look at this doubtable change!

Best Regards
Jungseok Lee

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>