On Mar 16, 2023, at 12:24, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com> wrote:
+ buf->bvec += 2;
+ buf->bvec[-2].bv_page = NULL;
+ buf->bvec[-1].bv_page = NULL;
NACK.
Can you elaborate?
Is it that you dislike allocating extra slots for protocol bits? Or just that
the bvec[] is offset by 2? Or some other reason?