From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03864C47256 for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 23:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78502166E for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 23:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lca.pw header.i=@lca.pw header.b="MEe5uJV1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B78502166E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lca.pw Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 35AF78E0005; Fri, 1 May 2020 19:17:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 30A1B8E0001; Fri, 1 May 2020 19:17:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 220238E0005; Fri, 1 May 2020 19:17:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0137.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.137]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065758E0001 for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 19:17:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3FB45BB for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 23:17:26 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76769713692.03.men72_6c08a6fca812 X-HE-Tag: men72_6c08a6fca812 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3402 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com (mail-qt1-f193.google.com [209.85.160.193]) by imf34.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 23:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id z90so9187201qtd.10 for ; Fri, 01 May 2020 16:17:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=jyJyd5oKEahX/i/R9m4SCxwEO1V+hvrK45dVTzQw94s=; b=MEe5uJV1EU+C5AMTpYJdXhmqhYt9q9QWSy5lZYkMCHCMCInESMkSVSxVXMEYCOImt7 vL7ESDahKG033crcJU+dRnzVJdSfXNq34+NpHmTDxAJTV08u9HKbhKLh/GdnpdJ0vGcF LZyztMp1VEfaXRIslI5YGG3ruMJbzGo4toUIjvDjayO1wLCKDYHk1PHNMk9LkWLxcrId EZgs6cZPVGkZBsIlxItSSqjhYM7/YmjX5w9ZWJYwv5bOxgR7IxxUivNbTBLGFgmipR2L YujC8h0nETvtcGgWK+cBN5DBCmQqJXqfM7PQJl9cYTzoYRmGXzpchaKBBmQLqH4LgAjp 3MqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=jyJyd5oKEahX/i/R9m4SCxwEO1V+hvrK45dVTzQw94s=; b=n+KnxTk4hj2kfU7MTE7uqCT7dwQxt3GidL05vfrQ/ZMZp2Yo8miD9OzEqfLfKUlKQb JiAG4Tk11ATZT83o7jtFfI5HpTXamuDxK11/mJebXk9pnFmDg2fQ9fEdZyTaBz3pW+i/ 1vgtG2JAJyfHP8yzDTnv31CjofMlWSSVyx19hZ5cUwJBZak5HmtU/qqa4CKejyujq8mh rw6yyMo+G/wkB/JLysYlpbTIlOhzLeVKTbFjwUIPgW6/JBrh1Dnz8Jf/KY7LTenK/HcJ K+cnZsMrKUDOBNS30qxF1q8lopC7vamMg+7ecr8dHr5FrPKT3udjPaUDbElqoYk9PyoS GY8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZWQCwpnRfctCCNTKhyFOe/dsWxYlqeLsUhXKo989NTcHbQA11m bUip5RfNzngBbp4J0RoZzKampQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL+hQnf9nSNBo2V+qE0ckAjwFXYh75FnE39rLv7zEAcP+363kfifDgTlvF9M88uujERkmTN7g== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3025:: with SMTP id f34mr6452414qte.219.1588375045649; Fri, 01 May 2020 16:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.183] (pool-71-184-117-43.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [71.184.117.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c68sm3869073qke.121.2020.05.01.16.17.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 May 2020 16:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Qian Cai Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: add panic_on_error to the debug facilities Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 19:17:24 -0400 Message-Id: <8CD9EA82-8BE1-47B4-AD35-7D300CAD745C@lca.pw> References: <20200501215441.GE27720@optiplex-lnx> Cc: Linux-MM , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, rientjes@google.com, penberg@kernel.org, cl@linux.com In-Reply-To: <20200501215441.GE27720@optiplex-lnx> To: Rafael Aquini X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: > On May 1, 2020, at 5:54 PM, Rafael Aquini wrote: >=20 > It seems like a good idea which also would required "adding things" > elsewhere, but doesn't look mutually exclusive with the approach here. Also, what=E2=80=99s so special about these bad pages here that deserve a cr= ash dump, but not other TAINT_BAD_PAGE places?=