From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F620C433EF for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 14:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDCA60F4A for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 14:16:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8DDCA60F4A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmx.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DA77F6B0071; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 10:16:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D56BC900002; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 10:16:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C1DCD6B0073; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 10:16:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0179.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.179]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4666B0071 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 10:16:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB40180ACF84 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 14:16:45 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78553720770.06.B6787AB Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF05801A89F for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 14:16:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1630851397; bh=3qmO5ehutY9JAMM/HBjYS1HtKYX/lmJDQxzvtdmPU54=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Sird1dtnDJcQNkfYAsZdgjHRrijpvXkxRklVcb1flv9jU8oHQ81PusNHYyytwtQT/ GKlfMq3K+iNQmz9i4akzAYtQLjiaLLM7tW7apMkl+nvSQCf3m4DZIaio/MV/stR2f6 /7B8LDFZZEYRmH3sDY1WhAk/YhOd7zGvQKIVRUJ4= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from homer.fritz.box ([185.191.217.159]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MAONd-1mH9f410wd-00BsqI; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 16:16:37 +0200 Message-ID: <89ba4f783114520c167cc915ba949ad2c04d6790.camel@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/33] SLUB: reduce irq disabled scope and make it RT compatible From: Mike Galbraith To: Vlastimil Babka , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , Linus Torvalds , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Thomas Gleixner , Mel Gorman Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 16:16:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210904105003.11688-1-vbabka@suse.cz> References: <20210904105003.11688-1-vbabka@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.41.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:4e+vYLUHAhuYRHLMmrCJJziDWGVmoPHY55k+ULjGSRh4JwZ2pKH CmHFxCMMcJG3Wo+/e4OqJj//2YENq4XdvfqBIbtdJA4mry4Sc06rTWADbxj9RmyauIbkMUc msmxRKsprZ7tF2OUcovTzOWaj2XCVLvP2x6ZNBtTI+PwhIQ+61SbYoycHzH6+KpdqC74vAh FVgXx4vsEGdXaGtlko94Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:TE7xvGKfCf8=:cBYdGYj6AM/VHTUvu9eyzv StuTZsakvBZb1PVU2d2EqN2DbCVTWL1bGQyZKJ+1TDwKfvx1Z7RCDXqdeuUwRxripIZHfckzy qMaWyzvFJuIfqYNDXojzb2gxnSMUiiCUU5vIuapZZDXe72nZfOfvY3XBs4XTLLPxkEmE2W0// F36/iW2djezfwYN2IJNIT9TwqPEHswk2orJtv5zJwh0KgU/OqpQIhePMKz5tmPYf4h/nehsKB j3v/BgGMN8Cm3R1G8pYjWGOiGSzqStM8NwHM7YPgm1B+Jg1aEYiCfwJQhgWMNODRMWjmqlAsV CsoDUCAWGiaBvHNE4lByVSrAQS65xSzai1D9ti9+0GgSSDvZwdTUZdT+ZzHuU3nMmatbF4Edm SYidr2KW8TgGxzFXAD6m275k+Hih4OoUVff9BORVzbb/POQ48WsuRxsojdIZSo2kfkX0a8Vya dtMyfZZXuf/cqhppdIUQWExMxBHfbqEbPiURkFRLAuvCti6PoPYOQ0INHMQGfzoaWGO+a4TnP 7R4CVI2Yg5XQ1eNCYEXZKMfssZ4baCbbjJm7f9dpdpeJFdYCeDdHg8QIJ/dec+LqpmURw2OEK LbNrtmAI+hRxQn1teZfadWDnQUvRdgNs8u/On4QUBYC7PM2xlZu509q+/FRQFR3aqdhb61GDT RmTaIXT5UytQBY+7sBDt8Mn7uuTH0ggSDOt4GNxPUo8eNg/JXtd2cQnLTfed7ndCMCk71Kpvh SY9esJnFOdIxAaI9DEVi3IN9GYTktjrlC/6++jv2eM5NhLek0h5jDctwqnO37dpvh5cReNuln zCTINMn5nVM8ST38a3qLEFyF/zEUIElzZUyPe413CFXdVvYpAZnGAuLCJz1FXq8mI+PkctQW7 f9ltl2CIlm5PQqGEekWAOfGgZ7XgedokJGHOOpba5Cl/JLhI/VuMWT5mloTEqR5vnfKDoex3g btbLip9q/nGfIYnOA0A8qEgOKj7tBpCWvxnyewDUhnxn9qWnKdZ2J0ktCMksjJBAI7cPEOJg2 osTz00j6VW3kE7DOxFf1t6sf9j7NgIw7OzRLpEAqOcJc5jPFyIAuEtlf8RdYKmuAoT3ppPLNL sXshXStOaxFcEJzJVHdY+xC0pTt3Hu3AOqM X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CFF05801A89F Authentication-Results: imf06.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=Sird1dtn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmx.de; spf=pass (imf06.hostedemail.com: domain of efault@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=efault@gmx.de X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Stat-Signature: jnhnpe38iesg7jmdwawyh69y71jggue7 X-HE-Tag: 1630851404-841681 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, 2021-09-04 at 12:49 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > I will of course continue testing, as I hope Mel and > the RT guys would soon too. I stuffed the set into tip, tip-rt and the raspberrypi 5.14 branch kernel+RT, and let my boxen run full LTP for exercise. As expected, nothing the least bit interesting happened, just a bit of run to run result diff noise due to.. deterministically challenged testcases. -Mike