From: "ashwin chaugule" <ashwin.chaugule@gmail.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: ashwin.chaugule@celunite.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
mikukkon@iki.fi, Mika Kukkonen <mikukkon@miku.homelinux.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bug in mm/thrash.c function grab_swap_token()
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:08:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89af10f90705140038u1a592909yf212294c4b28c967@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464771CA.3080906@redhat.com>
> >>> @@ -48,9 +48,8 @@ void grab_swap_token(void)
> >>> if (current_interval < current->mm->last_interval)
> >>> current->mm->token_priority++;
> >>> else {
> >>> - current->mm->token_priority--;
> >>> - if (unlikely(current->mm->token_priority < 0))
> >>> - current->mm->token_priority = 0;
> >>> + if (likely(current->mm->token_priority > 0))
> >>> + current->mm->token_priority--;
> >>> }
> >>> /* Check if we deserve the token */
> >>> if (current->mm->token_priority >
> >> argh.
> >>
> >> This has potential to cause large changes in system performance.
> >
> > I'm not sure how. Although, I think the logic still remains the same.
> > IOW, if the prio decrements to zero, it will remain zero until it
> > contends for token rapidly.
>
> The problem is that the original code would decrement an
> unsigned variable beyond zero, underflowing to a number
> just under 2^32...
>
> That would make the process basically a permanent owner
> of the swap token.
Hm. Although, the probability of token_prio going below zero in the
previous code was quite small. Nevertheless, I shall run the new fix
through some tests and post the results asap.
Cheers,
Ashwin
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070510122359.GA16433@srv1-m700-lanp.koti>
2007-05-10 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 6:49 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2007-05-11 6:58 ` ashwin chaugule
2007-05-13 20:15 ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-14 7:38 ` ashwin chaugule [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89af10f90705140038u1a592909yf212294c4b28c967@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ashwin.chaugule@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ashwin.chaugule@celunite.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mikukkon@iki.fi \
--cc=mikukkon@miku.homelinux.net \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox