From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: avoid zeroing user movable page twice with init_on_alloc=1
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 07:50:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89C00242-69F9-43E0-84E8-A4CF8369E86D@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV1hRp_NtR5YnJo=HsfgKQeH91J537Gh4gKk3PFZhSkbA@mail.gmail.com>
On 4 Dec 2024, at 5:41, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Zi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 5:13 PM Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> Commit 6471384af2a6 ("mm: security: introduce init_on_alloc=1 and
>> init_on_free=1 boot options") forces allocated page to be zeroed in
>> post_alloc_hook() when init_on_alloc=1.
>>
>> For order-0 folios, if arch does not define
>> vma_alloc_zeroed_movable_folio(), the default implementation again zeros
>> the page return from the buddy allocator. So the page is zeroed twice.
>> Fix it by passing __GFP_ZERO instead to avoid double page zeroing.
>> At the moment, s390,arm64,x86,alpha,m68k are not impacted since they
>> define their own vma_alloc_zeroed_movable_folio().
>>
>> For >0 order folios (mTHP and PMD THP), folio_zero_user() is called to
>> zero the folio again. Fix it by calling folio_zero_user() only if
>> init_on_alloc is set. All arch are impacted.
>>
>> Added alloc_zeroed() helper to encapsulate the init_on_alloc check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 5708d96da20b99b4 ("mm:
> avoid zeroing user movable page twice with init_on_alloc=1")
> in v6.13-rc1.
Thank you for reporting the error.
>
> This causing a panic when starting userspace on MIPS64 RBTX4927:
>
> Run /sbin/init as init process
> process '/lib/systemd/systemd' started with executable stack
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b
> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
> exitcode=0x0000000b ]---
>
> or
>
> Run /sbin/init as init process
> process '/lib/systemd/systemd' started with executable stack
> do_page_fault(): sending SIGSEGV to init for invalid read access
> from 00000000583399f8
> epc = 0000000077e2b094 in ld-2.19.so[3094,77e28000+22000]
> ra = 0000000077e2afcc in ld-2.19.so[2fcc,77e28000+22000]
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b
> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
> exitcode=0x0000000b ]---
>
> or
>
> Run /sbin/init as init process
> process '/lib/systemd/systemd' started with executable stack
> /sbin/inKernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
> exitcode=0x00007f00
> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
> exitcode=0x00007f00 ]---
> it: error while loading shared libraries: libpthread.so.0: object
> file has no dynamic section
Do you mind providing the full kernel log for this panic? And your kernel
config as well. I am trying to figure out why changing page zeroing from
twice to once can cause kernel panic.
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 15:03 Zi Yan
2024-10-11 18:23 ` Zi Yan
2024-10-16 12:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-16 13:30 ` Zi Yan
2024-10-21 12:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-21 14:21 ` Zi Yan
2024-10-22 14:33 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-04 10:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-04 12:50 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2024-12-04 12:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-04 15:24 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-04 15:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-04 16:16 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-04 16:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-04 16:58 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-05 8:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-05 17:32 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-06 8:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-04 17:33 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-04 17:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-04 18:13 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-04 18:16 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-04 21:21 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-04 21:24 ` John Hubbard
2024-12-04 18:30 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-05 8:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-05 8:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-05 16:05 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-05 17:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-05 17:38 ` Zi Yan
2024-12-06 8:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-12-05 8:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89C00242-69F9-43E0-84E8-A4CF8369E86D@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox