linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@loongson.cn>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] MIPS: Modify mem= and memmap= parameter
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 09:50:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8956c625-c18d-846e-3e65-7920776b27f3@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yh4uUoYT+YS5Jxsv@kernel.org>



On 03/01/2022 10:31 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 07:51:23PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/01/2022 05:55 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:28:57PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>>> In the current code, the kernel command-line parameter mem= and memmap=
>>>> can not work well on MIPS, this patchset refactors the related code to
>>>> fix them.
>>>>
>>>> For kdump on MIPS, if the users want to limit the memory region for the
>>>> capture kernel to avoid corrupting the memory image of the panic kernel,
>>>> use the parameter memmap=limit@base is the proper way, I will submit a
>>>> patch to use memmap=limit@base for kexec-tools after this patchset is
>>>> applied.
>>>
>>> Sorry, apparently I misread the prevoius version.
>>> What's wrong with the current implementation of mem=limit@base for the
>>> kdump case?
>>
>> In the current code, without this patchset, kernel boot hangs when add
>> mem=3G, mem=3G@64M or memmap=3G@64M to the command-line, it means that
>> the parameter mem= and memmap= have bug on mips.
>
> I can see how mem=3G may be wrong when the memory does not start at 0, but
> it seems to do the right thing of mem=3G@64M.
>
> Do you see system hangs with mem=3G@64M?

Yes.

>
> Do you have the logs before the hang?

Here are the logs:

[    0.000000] Linux version 5.17.0-rc3+ (loongson@linux) (gcc (GCC) 
7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-6), GNU ld version 
2.28-13.fc21.loongson.6) #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Mar 2 09:07:39 CST 2022
[    0.000000] CpuClock = 1800000000
[    0.000000] The bridge chip is LS7A
[    0.000000] CP0_Config3: CP0 16.3 (0xdc8030a0)
[    0.000000] CP0_PageGrain: CP0 5.1 (0x28000000)
[    0.000000] NUMA: Discovered 4 cpus on 1 nodes
[    0.000000] Node0: mem_type:1, mem_start:0x200000, mem_size:0xee MB
[    0.000000]        start_pfn:0x80, end_pfn:0x3c00, num_physpages:0x3b80
[    0.000000] Node0: mem_type:2, mem_start:0x90200000, mem_size:0x6fe MB
[    0.000000]        start_pfn:0x24080, end_pfn:0x40000, 
num_physpages:0x1fb00
[    0.000000] Node0: mem_type:2, mem_start:0x120000000, mem_size:0x1600 MB
[    0.000000]        start_pfn:0x48000, end_pfn:0xa0000, 
num_physpages:0x77b00
[    0.000000] Node0's addrspace_offset is 0x0
[    0.000000] Node0: start_pfn=0x80, end_pfn=0xa0000
[    0.000000] NUMA: set cpumask cpu 0 on node 0
[    0.000000] NUMA: set cpumask cpu 1 on node 0
[    0.000000] NUMA: set cpumask cpu 2 on node 0
[    0.000000] NUMA: set cpumask cpu 3 on node 0
[    0.000000] printk: bootconsole [early0] enabled
[    0.000000] CPU0 revision is: 0014c001 (ICT Loongson-3)
[    0.000000] FPU revision is: 00f70501
[    0.000000] MSA revision is: 00060140
[    0.000000] OF: fdt: No chosen node found, continuing without
[    0.000000] MIPS: machine is loongson,loongson64g-4core-ls7a
[    0.000000] User-defined physical RAM map overwrite
[    0.000000] Kernel sections are not in the memory maps
[    0.000000] Initrd not found or empty - disabling initrd


>
> As for memmap= option, it does not specify the memory map but rather alters
> the memory map passed by the firmware. Particularity in MIPS implementation
> it allows to add a single range of available or reserved memory.
>
> AFAIU, for the kdump use-case mem=X@Y should suffice.

We can modify some code to make mem=X@Y work well,
but according to Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt,
the common way is mem=X and memmap=X@Y, so mem=X@Y for mips seems
odd, the intention of this patchset is to make mem= and memmap=
work well and consistent with the other archs.

Thanks,
Tiezhu

>
>> Thanks,
>> Tiezhu
>>
>>>
>>>> v4: Fix some build warnings reported by kernel test robot
>>>>
>>>> v3: Modify patch #3 to maintain compatibility for memmap=limit{$,#,!}base,
>>>>     commented by Mike Rapoport, thank you
>>>>
>>>> v2: Add some new patches to support memmap=limit@base
>>>>
>>>> Tiezhu Yang (4):
>>>>   MIPS: Refactor early_parse_mem() to fix mem= parameter
>>>>   memblock: Introduce memblock_mem_range_remove_map()
>>>>   MIPS: Refactor early_parse_memmap() to fix memmap= parameter
>>>>   MIPS: Remove not used variable usermem
>>>>
>>>>  arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>>>  include/linux/memblock.h |  1 +
>>>>  mm/memblock.c            |  9 +++++--
>>>>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.1.0
>>>>
>>>
>>
>



  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-02  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-01  4:28 Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-01  4:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] MIPS: Refactor early_parse_mem() to fix mem= parameter Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-04 15:10   ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2022-03-04 15:35     ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2022-03-04 17:11       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-05 13:13         ` Mike Rapoport
2022-03-07 16:29         ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2022-03-07 22:07           ` Mike Rapoport
2022-03-07 23:09             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-01  4:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] memblock: Introduce memblock_mem_range_remove_map() Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-01  4:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] MIPS: Refactor early_parse_memmap() to fix memmap= parameter Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-01  4:29 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] MIPS: Remove not used variable usermem Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-01  9:55 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] MIPS: Modify mem= and memmap= parameter Mike Rapoport
2022-03-01 11:51   ` Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-01 14:31     ` Mike Rapoport
2022-03-02  1:50       ` Tiezhu Yang [this message]
2022-03-02  8:03         ` Mike Rapoport
2022-03-02  9:28           ` Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-02 12:50             ` Mike Rapoport
2022-03-04 17:05         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-05  6:19           ` Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-05 13:26             ` Mike Rapoport
2022-03-05 19:21               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-05 20:09                 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-03-06  1:22                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-03-05 20:53                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8956c625-c18d-846e-3e65-7920776b27f3@loongson.cn \
    --to=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lixuefeng@loongson.cn \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox