linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mel@csn.ul.ie,
	mhocko@suse.cz, Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Do not allow pagesize >= MAX_ORDER pool adjustment
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 01:54:00 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <890783047.150265.1294296840281.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110105131151.b5b9cf5b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>



----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 13:29:57 -0700
> Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net> wrote:
> 
> > Huge pages with order >= MAX_ORDER must be allocated at boot via
> > the kernel command line, they cannot be allocated or freed once
> > the kernel is up and running. Currently we allow values to be
> > written to the sysfs and sysctl files controling pool size for these
> > huge page sizes. This patch makes the store functions for
> > nr_hugepages
> > and nr_overcommit_hugepages return -EINVAL when the pool for a
> > page size >= MAX_ORDER is changed.
> >
> 
> gack, you people keep on making me look at the hugetlb code :(
> 
> > index 5cb71a9..15bd633 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -1443,6 +1443,12 @@ static ssize_t nr_hugepages_store_common(bool
> > obey_mempolicy,
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Why do these functions do a `return 0' if strict_strtoul() failed?
> 
> >
> >  	h = kobj_to_hstate(kobj, &nid);
> > +
> > + if (h->order >= MAX_ORDER) {
> > + NODEMASK_FREE(nodes_allowed);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> 
> Let's avoid having multiple unwind-and-return paths in a function,
> please. it often leads to resource leaks and locking errors as the
> code evolves.
> 
> ---
> a/mm/hugetlb.c~hugetlb-do-not-allow-pagesize-=-max_order-pool-adjustment-fix
> +++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1363,6 +1363,7 @@ static ssize_t nr_hugepages_show_common(
> 
> return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", nr_huge_pages);
> }
> +
> static ssize_t nr_hugepages_store_common(bool obey_mempolicy,
> struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> const char *buf, size_t len)
> @@ -1375,15 +1376,14 @@ static ssize_t nr_hugepages_store_common
> 
> err = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &count);
> if (err) {
> - NODEMASK_FREE(nodes_allowed);
> - return 0;
> + err = 0; /* This seems wrong */
> + goto out;
> }
> 
> h = kobj_to_hstate(kobj, &nid);
> -
> if (h->order >= MAX_ORDER) {
> - NODEMASK_FREE(nodes_allowed);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> }
> 
> if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> @@ -1411,6 +1411,9 @@ static ssize_t nr_hugepages_store_common
> NODEMASK_FREE(nodes_allowed);
> 
> return len;
> +out:
> + NODEMASK_FREE(nodes_allowed);
> + return err;
> }
> 
> static ssize_t nr_hugepages_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> _
As I mentioned in another thread. This is missing checking in 
hugetlb_overcommit_handler().

CAI Qian

-------------
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index c4a3558..60740bd 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1510,6 +1510,7 @@ static ssize_t nr_overcommit_hugepages_show(struct kobject *kobj,
        struct hstate *h = kobj_to_hstate(kobj, NULL);
        return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", h->nr_overcommit_huge_pages);
 }
+
 static ssize_t nr_overcommit_hugepages_store(struct kobject *kobj,
                struct kobj_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
 {
@@ -1986,6 +1987,9 @@ int hugetlb_overcommit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
        if (!write)
                tmp = h->nr_overcommit_huge_pages;
 
+       if (write && h->order >= MAX_ORDER)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
        table->data = &tmp;
        table->maxlen = sizeof(unsigned long);
        proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-06  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-05 20:29 Eric B Munson
2011-01-05 21:11 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-06  6:54   ` CAI Qian [this message]
2011-01-06  2:51 ` CAI Qian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=890783047.150265.1294296840281.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com \
    --to=caiqian@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=emunson@mgebm.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox