From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Atanasov <alexander.atanasov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kernel@openvz.org,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] Enable balloon drivers to report inflated memory
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 10:25:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88EDC41D-408F-4ADF-A933-0A6F36E5F262@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221005090158.2801592-3-alexander.atanasov@virtuozzo.com>
On Oct 5, 2022, at 2:01 AM, Alexander Atanasov <alexander.atanasov@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> Add counters to be updated by the balloon drivers.
> Create balloon notifier to propagate changes.
I missed the other patches before (including this one). Sorry, but next
time, please cc me.
I was looking through the series and I did not see actual users of the
notifier. Usually, it is not great to build an API without users.
[snip]
> +
> +static int balloon_notify(unsigned long val)
> +{
> + return srcu_notifier_call_chain(&balloon_chain, val, NULL);
Since you know the inflated_kb value here, why not to use it as an argument
to the callback? I think casting to (void *) and back is best. But you can
also provide pointer to the value. Doesn’t it sound better than having
potentially different notifiers reading different values?
Anyhow, without users (actual notifiers) it’s kind of hard to know how
reasonable it all is. For instance, is it balloon_notify() supposed to
prevent further balloon inflating/deflating until the notifier completes?
Accordingly, are callers to balloon_notify() expected to relinquish locks
before calling balloon_notify() to prevent deadlocks and high latency?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221005090158.2801592-1-alexander.atanasov@virtuozzo.com>
2022-10-05 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] Make place for common balloon code Alexander Atanasov
2022-10-05 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] Enable balloon drivers to report inflated memory Alexander Atanasov
2022-10-05 17:25 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2022-10-06 7:34 ` Alexander Atanasov
2022-10-06 21:07 ` Nadav Amit
2022-10-07 10:58 ` RFC " Alexander Atanasov
2022-10-10 6:18 ` Nadav Amit
2022-10-10 7:24 ` Alexander Atanasov
2022-10-10 14:47 ` Nadav Amit
2022-10-11 9:07 ` Alexander Atanasov
2022-10-11 9:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-14 12:50 ` Alexander Atanasov
2022-10-14 13:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-14 13:33 ` Alexander Atanasov
2022-10-14 13:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-14 14:10 ` Alexander Atanasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88EDC41D-408F-4ADF-A933-0A6F36E5F262@gmail.com \
--to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.atanasov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox