From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20050818222721.GC4275@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050818222721.GC4275@elf.ucw.cz> <20050816135900.GA3326@elf.ucw.cz> <200508121329.46533.phillips@istop.com> <200508110812.59986.phillips@arcor.de> <20050808145430.15394c3c.akpm@osdl.org> <26569.1123752390@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <5278.1123850479@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <7489.1124375598@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Rename PageChecked as PageMiscFS Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:04:42 +0100 Message-ID: <8880.1124445882@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Pavel Machek Cc: David Howells , Daniel Phillips , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Hugh Dickins List-ID: Pavel Machek wrote: > > I disagree again. I don't think PageFsMisc() is particularly ugly or > > unreadable; and it makes it a touch more likely that someone reading code > > that uses it will notice that it's a miscellaneous flag specifically for > > filesystem use (you can't rely on them going and looking in the header > > file for a comment). > > Well, is it PageFsMisc or PageFSMisc? Subject gets second variant, and > I like it better, too. (That does not mean I like it). The Subject wasn't set by me. Somehow the PageFsMisc variant looks better to me, but I could just be biased. David -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org