linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm, page_alloc: Split buffered_rmqueue
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:23:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8808c88d-3404-a3b5-b395-06936bbaa2ed@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170123153906.3122-2-mgorman@techsingularity.net>

On 01/23/2017 04:39 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> buffered_rmqueue removes a page from a given zone and uses the per-cpu
> list for order-0. This is fine but a hypothetical caller that wanted
> multiple order-0 pages has to disable/reenable interrupts multiple
> times. This patch structures buffere_rmqueue such that it's relatively
> easy to build a bulk order-0 page allocator. There is no functional
> change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

But I think you need a fix on top

[...]

> -struct page *buffered_rmqueue(struct zone *preferred_zone,
> +struct page *rmqueue(struct zone *preferred_zone,
>  			struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
>  			gfp_t gfp_flags, unsigned int alloc_flags,
>  			int migratetype)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct page *page;
> -	bool cold = ((gfp_flags & __GFP_COLD) != 0);
>  
>  	if (likely(order == 0)) {
> -		struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
> -		struct list_head *list;
> -
> -		local_irq_save(flags);
> -		do {
> -			pcp = &this_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset)->pcp;
> -			list = &pcp->lists[migratetype];
> -			if (list_empty(list)) {
> -				pcp->count += rmqueue_bulk(zone, 0,
> -						pcp->batch, list,
> -						migratetype, cold);
> -				if (unlikely(list_empty(list)))
> -					goto failed;
> -			}
> -
> -			if (cold)
> -				page = list_last_entry(list, struct page, lru);
> -			else
> -				page = list_first_entry(list, struct page, lru);
> -
> -			list_del(&page->lru);
> -			pcp->count--;
> +		page = rmqueue_pcplist(preferred_zone, zone, order,
> +				gfp_flags, migratetype);
> +		goto out;

page might be NULL here...

> +	}
>  
> -		} while (check_new_pcp(page));
> -	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * We most definitely don't want callers attempting to
> -		 * allocate greater than order-1 page units with __GFP_NOFAIL.
> -		 */
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE((gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL) && (order > 1));
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
> +	/*
> +	 * We most definitely don't want callers attempting to
> +	 * allocate greater than order-1 page units with __GFP_NOFAIL.
> +	 */
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE((gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL) && (order > 1));
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
>  
> -		do {
> -			page = NULL;
> -			if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER) {
> -				page = __rmqueue_smallest(zone, order, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC);
> -				if (page)
> -					trace_mm_page_alloc_zone_locked(page, order, migratetype);
> -			}
> -			if (!page)
> -				page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype);
> -		} while (page && check_new_pages(page, order));
> -		spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
> +	do {
> +		page = NULL;
> +		if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER) {
> +			page = __rmqueue_smallest(zone, order, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC);
> +			if (page)
> +				trace_mm_page_alloc_zone_locked(page, order, migratetype);
> +		}
>  		if (!page)
> -			goto failed;
> -		__mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order),
> -					  get_pcppage_migratetype(page));
> -	}
> +			page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype);
> +	} while (page && check_new_pages(page, order));
> +	spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
> +	if (!page)
> +		goto failed;
> +	__mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order),
> +				  get_pcppage_migratetype(page));
>  
>  	__count_zid_vm_events(PGALLOC, page_zonenum(page), 1 << order);
>  	zone_statistics(preferred_zone, zone);
>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  
> +out:
>  	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(bad_range(zone, page), page);

... and then this explodes?
I guess the easiest fix is change the condition to
"page && bad_range(...)"

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-23 15:39 [PATCH 0/4] Use per-cpu allocator for !irq requests and prepare for a bulk allocator v5 Mel Gorman
2017-01-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm, page_alloc: Split buffered_rmqueue Mel Gorman
2017-01-24 10:23   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2017-01-24 11:27     ` [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Split buffered_rmqueue -fix Mel Gorman
2017-01-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm, page_alloc: Split alloc_pages_nodemask Mel Gorman
2017-01-24 10:52   ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, page_alloc: Drain per-cpu pages from workqueue context Mel Gorman
2017-01-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm, page_alloc: Only use per-cpu allocator for irq-safe requests Mel Gorman
2017-01-24 13:16   ` Vlastimil Babka
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-17  9:29 [PATCH 0/4] Use per-cpu allocator for !irq requests and prepare for a bulk allocator v4 Mel Gorman
2017-01-17  9:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm, page_alloc: Split buffered_rmqueue Mel Gorman
2017-01-17 18:07   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-17 18:17     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-17 20:20       ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-17 21:07         ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-17 21:24           ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-09 16:35 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Fast noirq bulk page allocator v2r7 Mel Gorman
2017-01-09 16:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm, page_alloc: Split buffered_rmqueue Mel Gorman
2017-01-11 12:31   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-12  3:09   ` Hillf Danton
2017-01-04 11:10 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Fast noirq bulk page allocator Mel Gorman
2017-01-04 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm, page_alloc: Split buffered_rmqueue Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8808c88d-3404-a3b5-b395-06936bbaa2ed@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox