linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: "Barry Song" <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Steven Price" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>, 郭健 <guojian@oppo.com>,
	hanchuanhua <hanchuanhua@oppo.com>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Minchan Kim" <minchan@kernel.org>,
	"Yang Shi" <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	"Barry Song" <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>,
	"张诗明(Simon Zhang)" <zhangshiming@oppo.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] arm64: enable THP_SWAP for arm64
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 11:28:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgh5232o.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2d6ef91-f447-ffb4-2a6e-bc95533e5167@arm.com> (Anshuman Khandual's message of "Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:38:10 +0530")

Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> writes:

> On 7/19/22 06:53, Barry Song wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:44 PM Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>>>>
>>>> THP_SWAP has been proven to improve the swap throughput significantly
>>>> on x86_64 according to commit bd4c82c22c367e ("mm, THP, swap: delay
>>>> splitting THP after swapped out").
>>>> As long as arm64 uses 4K page size, it is quite similar with x86_64
>>>> by having 2MB PMD THP. THP_SWAP is architecture-independent, thus,
>>>> enabling it on arm64 will benefit arm64 as well.
>>>> A corner case is that MTE has an assumption that only base pages
>>>> can be swapped. We won't enable THP_SWAP for ARM64 hardware with
>>>> MTE support until MTE is reworked to coexist with THP_SWAP.
>>>>
>>>> A micro-benchmark is written to measure thp swapout throughput as
>>>> below,
>>>>
>>>>  unsigned long long tv_to_ms(struct timeval tv)
>>>>  {
>>>>       return tv.tv_sec * 1000 + tv.tv_usec / 1000;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  main()
>>>>  {
>>>>       struct timeval tv_b, tv_e;;
>>>>  #define SIZE 400*1024*1024
>>>>       volatile void *p = mmap(NULL, SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>>>>                               MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
>>>>       if (!p) {
>>>>               perror("fail to get memory");
>>>>               exit(-1);
>>>>       }
>>>>
>>>>       madvise(p, SIZE, MADV_HUGEPAGE);
>>>>       memset(p, 0x11, SIZE); /* write to get mem */
>>>>
>>>>       gettimeofday(&tv_b, NULL);
>>>>       madvise(p, SIZE, MADV_PAGEOUT);
>>>>       gettimeofday(&tv_e, NULL);
>>>>
>>>>       printf("swp out bandwidth: %ld bytes/ms\n",
>>>>                       SIZE/(tv_to_ms(tv_e) - tv_to_ms(tv_b)));
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> Testing is done on rk3568 64bit quad core processor Quad Core
>>>> Cortex-A55 platform - ROCK 3A.
>>>> thp swp throughput w/o patch: 2734bytes/ms (mean of 10 tests)
>>>> thp swp throughput w/  patch: 3331bytes/ms (mean of 10 tests)
>>>>
>>>> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>>>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
>>>> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  -v3:
>>>>  * refine the commit log;
>>>>  * add a benchmark result;
>>>>  * refine the macro of arch_thp_swp_supported
>>>>  Thanks to the comments of Anshuman, Andrew, Steven
>>>>
>>>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig               |  1 +
>>>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h |  6 ++++++
>>>>  include/linux/huge_mm.h          | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>  mm/swap_slots.c                  |  2 +-
>>>>  4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>>> index 1652a9800ebe..e1c540e80eec 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ config ARM64
>>>>       select ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP
>>>>       select ARCH_WANT_LD_ORPHAN_WARN
>>>>       select ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR
>>>> +     select ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP if ARM64_4K_PAGES
>>>>       select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL
>>>>       select ARM_AMBA
>>>>       select ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> index 0b6632f18364..78d6f6014bfb 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> @@ -45,6 +45,12 @@
>>>>       __flush_tlb_range(vma, addr, end, PUD_SIZE, false, 1)
>>>>  #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>>>>
>>>> +static inline bool arch_thp_swp_supported(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return !system_supports_mte();
>>>> +}
>>>> +#define arch_thp_swp_supported arch_thp_swp_supported
>>>> +
>>>>  /*
>>>>   * Outside of a few very special situations (e.g. hibernation), we always
>>>>   * use broadcast TLB invalidation instructions, therefore a spurious page
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>> index de29821231c9..4ddaf6ad73ef 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>> @@ -461,4 +461,16 @@ static inline int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio,
>>>>       return split_huge_page_to_list(&folio->page, list);
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * archs that select ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP but don't support THP_SWP due to
>>>> + * limitations in the implementation like arm64 MTE can override this to
>>>> + * false
>>>> + */
>>>> +#ifndef arch_thp_swp_supported
>>>> +static inline bool arch_thp_swp_supported(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return true;
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> How about the following?
>>>
>>> static inline bool arch_wants_thp_swap(void)
>>> {
>>>      return IS_ENABLED(ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP);
>>> }
>> 
>> This looks good. then i'll need to change arm64 to
>> 
>>  +static inline bool arch_thp_swp_supported(void)
>>  +{
>>  +     return IS_ENABLED(ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP) &&  !system_supports_mte();
>>  +}
>
> Why ? CONFIG_THP_SWAP depends on ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP. In folio_alloc_swap(),
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP) enabled, will also imply ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP too
> is enabled. Hence checking for ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP again does not make sense
> either in the generic fallback stub, or in arm64 platform override. Because
> without ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP enabled, arch_thp_swp_supported() should never
> be called in the first place.

For the only caller now, the checking looks redundant.  But the original
proposed implementation as follows,

static inline bool arch_thp_swp_supported(void)
{
     return true;
}

will return true even on architectures that don't support/want THP swap.
That will confuse people too.

And the "redundant" checking has no run time overhead, because compiler
will do the trick.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Huang, Ying
>>>
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>>  #endif /* _LINUX_HUGE_MM_H */
>>>> diff --git a/mm/swap_slots.c b/mm/swap_slots.c
>>>> index 2a65a89b5b4d..10b94d64cc25 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/swap_slots.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/swap_slots.c
>>>> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ swp_entry_t folio_alloc_swap(struct folio *folio)
>>>>       entry.val = 0;
>>>>
>>>>       if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
>>>> -             if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP))
>>>> +             if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP) && arch_thp_swp_supported())
>>>>                       get_swap_pages(1, &entry, folio_nr_pages(folio));
>>>>               goto out;
>>>>       }
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Barry
>> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-19  3:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-18  9:00 Barry Song
2022-07-18 16:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-18 20:14   ` Barry Song
2022-07-19  0:43 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-19  1:23   ` Barry Song
2022-07-19  3:08     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-07-19  3:28       ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2022-07-19  3:34         ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-07-19  3:58           ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-19  3:59           ` Barry Song
2022-07-19  4:03             ` Barry Song
2022-07-19  5:46               ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-19  6:13                 ` Barry Song
2022-07-19  6:33                   ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-19  7:01                     ` Barry Song
2022-07-19  7:19                       ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-19  8:44                         ` Barry Song
2022-07-19  4:03             ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-07-20  1:46               ` Barry Song
2022-07-20  2:36                 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-07-20  9:17                   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zgh5232o.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=guojian@oppo.com \
    --cc=hanchuanhua@oppo.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangshiming@oppo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox