linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,  <rppt@kernel.org>,
	<mgorman@techsingularity.net>,  <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	 <mhocko@suse.com>, <david@redhat.com>,  <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/page_alloc: add some comments to explain the possible hole in __pageblock_pfn_to_page()
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:22:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zg6wkdy8.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50b5e05dbb007e3a969ac946bc9ee0b2b77b185f.1682342634.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> (Baolin Wang's message of "Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:45:40 +0800")

Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> writes:

> Now the __pageblock_pfn_to_page() is used by set_zone_contiguous(), which
> checks whether the given zone contains holes, and uses pfn_to_online_page()
> to validate if the start pfn is online and valid, as well as using pfn_valid()
> to validate the end pfn.
>
> However, the __pageblock_pfn_to_page() function may return non-NULL even
> if the end pfn of a pageblock is in a memory hole in some situations. For
> example, if the pageblock order is MAX_ORDER, which will fall into 2
> sub-sections, and the end pfn of the pageblock may be hole even though
> the start pfn is online and valid.
>
> See below memory layout as an example and suppose the pageblock order
> is MAX_ORDER.
>
> [    0.000000] Zone ranges:
> [    0.000000]   DMA      [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x00000000ffffffff]
> [    0.000000]   DMA32    empty
> [    0.000000]   Normal   [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x0000001fa7ffffff]
> [    0.000000] Movable zone start for each node
> [    0.000000] Early memory node ranges
> [    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x0000001fa3c7ffff]
> [    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa3c80000-0x0000001fa3ffffff]
> [    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa4000000-0x0000001fa402ffff]
> [    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa4030000-0x0000001fa40effff]
> [    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa40f0000-0x0000001fa73cffff]
> [    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa73d0000-0x0000001fa745ffff]
> [    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa7460000-0x0000001fa746ffff]
> [    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa7470000-0x0000001fa758ffff]
> [    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa7590000-0x0000001fa7dfffff]
>
> Focus on the last memory range, and there is a hole for the range [mem
> 0x0000001fa7590000-0x0000001fa7dfffff]. That means the last pageblock
> will contain the range from 0x1fa7c00000 to 0x1fa7ffffff, since the
> pageblock must be 4M aligned. And in this pageblock, these pfns will
> fall into 2 sub-section (the sub-section size is 2M aligned).
>
> So, the 1st sub-section (indicates pfn range: 0x1fa7c00000 -
> 0x1fa7dfffff ) in this pageblock is valid by calling subsection_map_init()
> in free_area_init(), but the 2nd sub-section (indicates pfn range:
> 0x1fa7e00000 - 0x1fa7ffffff ) in this pageblock is not valid.
>
> This did not break anything until now, but the zone continuous is fragile
> in this possible scenario. So as previous discussion[1], it is better to
> add some comments to explain this possible issue in case there are some
> future pfn walkers that rely on this.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87r0sdsmr6.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> Changes from v2:
>  - Update the commit log and comments per Michal, thanks.
> Changes from v1:
>  - Update the comments per Ying and Mike, thanks.
>
> Note, I did not add Huang Ying's reviewed tag, since there are some
> updates per Michal's suggestion. Ying, please review the v3. Thanks.
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 6457b64fe562..bd124390c79b 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1502,6 +1502,15 @@ void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>   * interleaving within a single pageblock. It is therefore sufficient to check
>   * the first and last page of a pageblock and avoid checking each individual
>   * page in a pageblock.
> + *
> + * Note: the function may return non-NULL struct page even for a page block
> + * which contains a memory hole (i.e. there is no physical memory for a subset
> + * of the pfn range). For example, if the pageblock order is MAX_ORDER, which
> + * will fall into 2 sub-sections, and the end pfn of the pageblock may be hole
> + * even though the start pfn is online and valid. This should be safe most of
> + * the time because struct pages are still zero pre-filled and pfn walkers

I don't think the pfn is just zero-filled even it's a hole.  Can you
confirm that?  In memmap_init() and memmap_init_zone_range(),
init_unavailable_range() is called to initialize the struct page.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> + * shouldn't touch any physical memory range for which they do not recognize
> + * any specific metadata in struct pages.
>   */
>  struct page *__pageblock_pfn_to_page(unsigned long start_pfn,
>  				     unsigned long end_pfn, struct zone *zone)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-25  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-24 13:45 [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/page_alloc: drop the unnecessary pfn_valid() for start pfn Baolin Wang
2023-04-24 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/page_alloc: add some comments to explain the possible hole in __pageblock_pfn_to_page() Baolin Wang
2023-04-24 14:47   ` Michal Hocko
2023-04-25  0:22   ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2023-04-25  1:27     ` Baolin Wang
2023-04-25  2:30       ` Huang, Ying
2023-04-25  9:05       ` Michal Hocko
2023-04-25 12:29         ` Baolin Wang
2023-04-25 12:44           ` [PATCH v4] " Baolin Wang
2023-04-26  1:23             ` Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zg6wkdy8.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox