Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/migrate_device.c: Flush TLB while holding PTL

[Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>]

"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:

> Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> writes:
>
>> When clearing a PTE the TLB should be flushed whilst still holding the
>> PTL to avoid a potential race with madvise/munmap/etc. For example
>> consider the following sequence:
>>
>>   CPU0                          CPU1
>>   ----                          ----
>>
>>   migrate_vma_collect_pmd()
>>   pte_unmap_unlock()
>>                                 madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)
>>                                 -> zap_pte_range()
>>                                 pte_offset_map_lock()
>>                                 [ PTE not present, TLB not flushed ]
>>                                 pte_unmap_unlock()
>>                                 [ page is still accessible via stale TLB ]
>>   flush_tlb_range()
>>
>> In this case the page may still be accessed via the stale TLB entry
>> after madvise returns. Fix this by flushing the TLB while holding the
>> PTL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
>> Reported-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
>> Fixes: 8c3328f1f36a ("mm/migrate: migrate_vma() unmap page from vma while collecting pages")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes for v3:
>>
>>  - New for v3
>> ---
>>  mm/migrate_device.c | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
>> index 27fb37d..6a5ef9f 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate_device.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
>> @@ -254,13 +254,14 @@ static int migrate_vma_collect_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
>>  		migrate->dst[migrate->npages] = 0;
>>  		migrate->src[migrate->npages++] = mpfn;
>>  	}
>> -	arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
>> -	pte_unmap_unlock(ptep - 1, ptl);
>>
>>  	/* Only flush the TLB if we actually modified any entries */
>>  	if (unmapped)
>>  		flush_tlb_range(walk->vma, start, end);
>
> It appears that we can increase "unmapped" only if ptep_get_and_clear()
> is used?

In other words you mean we only need to increase unmapped if pte_present
&& !anon_exclusive?

Agree, that's a good optimisation to make. However I'm just trying to
solve a data corruption issue (not dirtying the page) here, so will post
that as a separate optimisation patch. Thanks.

 - Alistair

> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
>
>> +	arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
>> +	pte_unmap_unlock(ptep - 1, ptl);
>> +
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>
>>
>> base-commit: ffcf9c5700e49c0aee42dcba9a12ba21338e8136