linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	 Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>,
	 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	 bpf@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: skip cgroup_file_notify if spinning is not allowed
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 14:20:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0qsa95d.fsf@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905201606.66198-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> (Shakeel Butt's message of "Fri, 5 Sep 2025 13:16:06 -0700")

Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> writes:

> Generally memcg charging is allowed from all the contexts including NMI
> where even spinning on spinlock can cause locking issues. However one
> call chain was missed during the addition of memcg charging from any
> context support. That is try_charge_memcg() -> memcg_memory_event() ->
> cgroup_file_notify().
>
> The possible function call tree under cgroup_file_notify() can acquire
> many different spin locks in spinning mode. Some of them are
> cgroup_file_kn_lock, kernfs_notify_lock, pool_workqeue's lock. So, let's
> just skip cgroup_file_notify() from memcg charging if the context does
> not allow spinning.

Hmm, what about OOM events? Losing something like MEMCG_LOW doesn't look
like a bit deal, but OOM events can be way more important.

Should we instead preserve the event (e.g. as a pending_event_mask) and
raise it on the next occasion / from a different context?

Thanks


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-05 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-05 20:16 Shakeel Butt
2025-09-05 20:48 ` Peilin Ye
2025-09-05 21:33   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-05 21:40     ` Peilin Ye
2025-09-08  9:08   ` Michal Hocko
2025-09-08 17:11     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-09  6:20       ` Michal Hocko
2025-09-05 21:20 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2025-09-05 21:25   ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-05 21:35     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-05 21:31   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-05 21:42     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-09-05 21:50       ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-05 22:44         ` Roman Gushchin
2025-09-08  9:28 ` Michal Hocko
2025-09-08 17:39   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-19  2:49 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-20  2:47   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-20  4:31     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-20 15:54       ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y0qsa95d.fsf@linux.dev \
    --to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yepeilin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox