From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Weiner Subject: Re: [RFC 10/22] m68k: Use generic show_mem() Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:10:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87wsnfnfdu.fsf@saeurebad.de> References: <12071688283927-git-send-email-hannes@saeurebad.de> <1207168941186-git-send-email-hannes@saeurebad.de> <87myobp02g.fsf@saeurebad.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:39:16 +0200 (CEST)") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@elte.hu, davem@davemloft.net, hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, starvik@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.net, takata@linux-m32r.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, kyle@parisc-linux.org, paulus@samba.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, jdike@addtoit.com, miles@gnu.org, chris@zankel.net, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, tony.luck@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-mm.kvack.org Hi, Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > So I suggest to add an additional (first) step to the consolidation: remove all > duplicates. I shall do that. Problem is, I had a patch-series removing only parts of the duplication (shame on me) and not all of these patches are yet in the subsystem trees and still partially in -mm. None of them have hit mainline yet. Suggestions? The earlier patch-series was called `remove redundant output from show_mem()'. Sorry for the wasted time. These cleanups already took more energy than they are worth it, I guess... :/ Hannes