From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: hch@lst.de, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] iommu-common: move to arch/sparc
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:53:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wox60za6.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5741528-427d-3537-5498-2080766df0fe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> On 04/16/2018 07:28 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:26:07 +0530
>>
>>> On 04/15/2018 08:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> This code is only used by sparc, and all new iommu drivers should use the
>>>> drivers/iommu/ framework. Also remove the unused exports.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>>
>>> Right, these functions are used only from SPARC architecture. Simple
>>> git grep confirms it as well. Hence it makes sense to move them into
>>> arch code instead.
>>
>> Well, we put these into a common location and used type friendly for
>> powerpc because we hoped powerpc would convert over to using this
>> common piece of code as well.
>>
>> But nobody did the powerpc work.
Sorry.
>> If you look at the powerpc iommu support, it's the same code basically
>> for entry allocation.
>
> I understand. But there are some differences in iommu_table structure,
> how both regular and large IOMMU pools are being initialized etc. So
> if the movement of code into SPARC help cleaning up these generic config
> options in general, I guess we should do that. But I will leave it upto
> others who have more experience in this area.
>
> +mpe
This is the first I've heard of it, I guess it's probably somewhere on
Ben's append-only TODO list.
Some of the code does look very similar, but not 100%. So someone would
need to do some work to reconcile the two and test the result. TBH I
doubt we're going to get around to it any time soon. Unless we have a
volunteer?
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-15 14:59 centralize SWIOTLB config symbol and misc other cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 01/12] iommu-common: move to arch/sparc Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-16 8:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-04-16 13:58 ` David Miller
2018-04-17 5:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-04-17 12:53 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2018-04-17 19:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 02/12] iommu-helper: unexport iommu_area_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-15 21:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-04-16 9:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
[not found] ` <20180415145947.1248-1-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 03/12] iommu-helper: mark iommu_is_span_boundary as inline Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 04/12] iommu-helper: move the IOMMU_HELPER config symbol to lib/ Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-16 9:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 05/12] scatterlist: move the NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH config symbol to lib/Kconfig Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-16 9:54 ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 06/12] dma-mapping: move the NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE " Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-16 9:57 ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 07/12] arch: remove the ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT config symbol Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 08/12] arch: define the ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT config symbol in lib/Kconfig Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 09/12] PCI: remove CONFIG_PCI_BUS_ADDR_T_64BIT Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-20 18:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 10/12] arm: don't build swiotlb by default Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: move the SWIOTLB config symbol to lib/Kconfig Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-17 6:10 ` Anshuman Khandual
2018-04-15 14:59 ` [PATCH 12/12] swiotlb: remove the CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS ifdefs Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-23 17:04 centralize SWIOTLB config symbol and misc other cleanups V2 Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-23 17:04 ` [PATCH 01/12] iommu-common: move to arch/sparc Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wox60za6.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox