From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mm/gup.c: stricter check on THP migration entry during follow_pmd_mask
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:01:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnk4rl2w.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211217023418.731424-1-lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com> (Li Xinhai's message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:34:18 +0800")
Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com> writes:
> When BUG_ON check for THP migration entry, the exsiting code only check
s/exsiting/existing/
Found some misspelling in the comments too. Please fix them with some
tool.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> thp_migration_supported case, but not for !thp_migration_supported case.
> If !thp_migration_supported() and !pmd_present(), the original code may
> dead loop in theory. To make the BUG_ON check consistent, we need catch
> both cases.
>
> Move the BUG_ON check one step eariler, because if the bug happen we
> should know it instead of depend on FOLL_MIGRATION been used by caller.
>
> Because pmdval instead of *pmd is read by the is_pmd_migration_entry()
> check, the existing code don't help to avoid useless locking within
> pmd_migration_entry_wait(), so remove that check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> V2->V3:
> mention about the dead loop in commit message.
>
> V1->V2:
> Move the BUG_ON() check before if(!(flags & FOLL_MIGRATION)); and add comments
> for it.
>
>
> mm/gup.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 2c51e9748a6a..94d0e586ca0b 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -642,12 +642,17 @@ static struct page *follow_pmd_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> }
> retry:
> if (!pmd_present(pmdval)) {
> + /*
> + * Should never reach here, if thp migration is not supported;
> + * Otherwise, it must be a thp miration entry.
> + */
> + VM_BUG_ON(!thp_migration_supported() ||
> + !is_pmd_migration_entry(pmdval));
> +
> if (likely(!(flags & FOLL_MIGRATION)))
> return no_page_table(vma, flags);
> - VM_BUG_ON(thp_migration_supported() &&
> - !is_pmd_migration_entry(pmdval));
> - if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmdval))
> - pmd_migration_entry_wait(mm, pmd);
> +
> + pmd_migration_entry_wait(mm, pmd);
> pmdval = READ_ONCE(*pmd);
> /*
> * MADV_DONTNEED may convert the pmd to null because
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-17 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-17 2:34 Li Xinhai
2021-12-17 3:01 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2021-12-17 5:49 ` Li Xinhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnk4rl2w.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox