linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>,  <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,  <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,  <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	<corbet@lwn.net>,  <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 <honggyu.kim@sk.com>, <rakie.kim@sk.com>,  <hyeongtak.ji@sk.com>,
	 <mhocko@kernel.org>, <vtavarespetr@micron.com>,
	 <jgroves@micron.com>, <ravis.opensrc@micron.com>,
	 <sthanneeru@micron.com>, <emirakhur@micron.com>,
	 <Hasan.Maruf@amd.com>, <seungjun.ha@samsung.com>,
	 <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	 Srinivasulu Thanneeru <sthanneeru.opensrc@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/mempolicy: introduce MPOL_WEIGHTED_INTERLEAVE for weighted interleaving
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 11:02:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmroevjc.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zbr/iv3IfVqhOglE@memverge.com> (Gregory Price's message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2024 21:18:50 -0500")

Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 09:55:07AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com> writes:
>> > -       u8 __rcu *table, *weights, weight;
>> > +       u8 __rcu *table, __rcu *weights, weight;
>> 
>> The __rcu usage can be checked with `sparse` directly.  For example,
>> 
>> make C=1 mm/mempolicy.o
>> 
>
> fixed and squashed, all the __rcu usage i had except the global pointer
> have been used.  Thanks for the reference material, was struggling to
> understand that.
>
>> > task->mems_allowed_seq protection (added as 4th patch)
>> > ------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > +       cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
>> >         if (!current->il_weight || !node_isset(node, policy->nodes)) {
>> >                 node = next_node_in(node, policy->nodes);
>> 
>> node will be changed in the loop.  So we need to change the logic here.
>> 
>
> new patch, if it all looks good i'll ship it in v5
>
> ~Gregory
>
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index d8cc3a577986..4e5a640d10b8 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1878,11 +1878,17 @@ bool apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone)
>
>  static unsigned int weighted_interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
>  {
> -       unsigned int node = current->il_prev;
> -
> -       if (!current->il_weight || !node_isset(node, policy->nodes)) {
> -               node = next_node_in(node, policy->nodes);
> -               /* can only happen if nodemask is being rebound */
> +       unsigned int node;

IIUC, "node" may be used without initialization.

--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> +       unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
> +
> +retry:
> +       /* to prevent miscount use tsk->mems_allowed_seq to detect rebind */
> +       cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
> +       if (!current->il_weight ||
> +           !node_isset(current->il_prev, policy->nodes)) {
> +               node = next_node_in(current->il_prev, policy->nodes);
> +               if (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie))
> +                       goto retry;
>                 if (node == MAX_NUMNODES)
>                         return node;
>                 current->il_prev = node;
> @@ -1896,8 +1902,14 @@ static unsigned int weighted_interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
>  static unsigned int interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
>  {
>         unsigned int nid;
> +       unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
> +
> +       /* to prevent miscount, use tsk->mems_allowed_seq to detect rebind */
> +       do {
> +               cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
> +               nid = next_node_in(current->il_prev, policy->nodes);
> +       } while (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie));
>
> -       nid = next_node_in(current->il_prev, policy->nodes);
>         if (nid < MAX_NUMNODES)
>                 current->il_prev = nid;
>         return nid;
> @@ -2374,6 +2386,7 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_array_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
>                 struct page **page_array)
>  {
>         struct task_struct *me = current;
> +       unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
>         unsigned long total_allocated = 0;
>         unsigned long nr_allocated = 0;
>         unsigned long rounds;
> @@ -2391,7 +2404,13 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_array_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
>         if (!nr_pages)
>                 return 0;
>
> -       nnodes = read_once_policy_nodemask(pol, &nodes);
> +       /* read the nodes onto the stack, retry if done during rebind */
> +       do {
> +               cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
> +               nnodes = read_once_policy_nodemask(pol, &nodes);
> +       } while (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie));
> +
> +       /* if the nodemask has become invalid, we cannot do anything */
>         if (!nnodes)
>                 return 0;


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-01  3:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-30 18:20 [PATCH v4 0/3] mm/mempolicy: weighted interleave mempolicy and sysfs extension Gregory Price
2024-01-30 18:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/mempolicy: implement the sysfs-based weighted_interleave interface Gregory Price
2024-01-30 18:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/mempolicy: refactor a read-once mechanism into a function for re-use Gregory Price
2024-01-30 18:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/mempolicy: introduce MPOL_WEIGHTED_INTERLEAVE for weighted interleaving Gregory Price
2024-01-31  5:12   ` Gregory Price
2024-01-31  6:43   ` Huang, Ying
2024-01-31  7:43     ` Gregory Price
2024-01-31  9:19       ` Huang, Ying
2024-01-31 16:35         ` Gregory Price
2024-01-31 17:29         ` Gregory Price
2024-02-01  1:55           ` Huang, Ying
2024-02-01  2:01             ` Gregory Price
2024-02-01  2:18             ` Gregory Price
2024-02-01  3:02               ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2024-02-01  3:10                 ` Gregory Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wmroevjc.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=Hasan.Maruf@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=emirakhur@micron.com \
    --cc=gourry.memverge@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=hyeongtak.ji@sk.com \
    --cc=jgroves@micron.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=ravis.opensrc@micron.com \
    --cc=seungjun.ha@samsung.com \
    --cc=sthanneeru.opensrc@micron.com \
    --cc=sthanneeru@micron.com \
    --cc=vtavarespetr@micron.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox