From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 0/3] bootmem2: a memory block-oriented boot time allocator
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 13:23:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ve1touz1.fsf@saeurebad.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080505095938.326928514@symbol.fehenstaub.lan> (Johannes Weiner's message of "Mon, 05 May 2008 11:59:38 +0200")
Hi,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> writes:
> The problem is that memory nodes are not anymore garuanteed to be
> linear on certain configurations, they may overlap each other and a
> node might span page ranges that are not physically residing on it.
>
> Note that this is in no way theoretical only, bootmem suffers from
> this fact right now: A pfn range has to be operated on on every node
> that holds it (because a PFN is not unique anymore) and bootmem can
> not garuantee that the memory allocated from a specific node actually
> resides on that node.
>
> For example:
>
> node 0: 0-2G, 4-6G
> node 1: 2-4G, 6-8G
>
> Bootmem currently sees the 2-4G range twice (and has to operate on
> both node's bitmaps) and if memory is allocated on node 1, it may
> return memory that is between the 2-4G range and actually resides on
> node 0.
Uh, mixup. The memory resides on node 1 but may get allocated from
node 0.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-05 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-05 9:59 Johannes Weiner
2008-05-05 9:59 ` [rfc][patch 1/3] mm: Define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS unconditionally Johannes Weiner
2008-05-05 9:59 ` [rfc][patch 2/3] mm: bootmem2 - memory block oriented boot time allocator Johannes Weiner
2008-05-05 9:59 ` [rfc][patch 3/3] x86: Use bootmem2 on x86_32 Johannes Weiner
2008-05-05 11:23 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2008-05-05 15:23 ` [rfc][patch 0/3] bootmem2: a memory block-oriented boot time allocator Linus Torvalds
2008-05-05 16:04 ` Robin Holt
2008-05-06 9:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-05-05 18:58 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-06 8:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-05-07 12:29 ` [RFC no patch yet] bootmem2: Another try Johannes Weiner
2008-05-07 14:37 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ve1touz1.fsf@saeurebad.de \
--to=hannes@saeurebad.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox