linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 0/3] bootmem2: a memory block-oriented boot time allocator
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 13:23:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ve1touz1.fsf@saeurebad.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080505095938.326928514@symbol.fehenstaub.lan> (Johannes Weiner's message of "Mon, 05 May 2008 11:59:38 +0200")

Hi,

Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> writes:

> The problem is that memory nodes are not anymore garuanteed to be
> linear on certain configurations, they may overlap each other and a
> node might span page ranges that are not physically residing on it.
>
> Note that this is in no way theoretical only, bootmem suffers from
> this fact right now: A pfn range has to be operated on on every node
> that holds it (because a PFN is not unique anymore) and bootmem can
> not garuantee that the memory allocated from a specific node actually
> resides on that node.
>
> For example:
>
> 	node 0: 0-2G, 4-6G
> 	node 1: 2-4G, 6-8G
>
> Bootmem currently sees the 2-4G range twice (and has to operate on
> both node's bitmaps) and if memory is allocated on node 1, it may
> return memory that is between the 2-4G range and actually resides on
> node 0.

Uh, mixup.  The memory resides on node 1 but may get allocated from
node 0.

	Hannes

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-05 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-05  9:59 Johannes Weiner
2008-05-05  9:59 ` [rfc][patch 1/3] mm: Define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS unconditionally Johannes Weiner
2008-05-05  9:59 ` [rfc][patch 2/3] mm: bootmem2 - memory block oriented boot time allocator Johannes Weiner
2008-05-05  9:59 ` [rfc][patch 3/3] x86: Use bootmem2 on x86_32 Johannes Weiner
2008-05-05 11:23 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2008-05-05 15:23 ` [rfc][patch 0/3] bootmem2: a memory block-oriented boot time allocator Linus Torvalds
2008-05-05 16:04   ` Robin Holt
2008-05-06  9:00     ` Johannes Weiner
2008-05-05 18:58 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-06  8:57   ` Johannes Weiner
2008-05-07 12:29 ` [RFC no patch yet] bootmem2: Another try Johannes Weiner
2008-05-07 14:37   ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ve1touz1.fsf@saeurebad.de \
    --to=hannes@saeurebad.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox