From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f72.google.com (mail-pg0-f72.google.com [74.125.83.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0146B0390 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 07:17:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f72.google.com with SMTP id p20so99688096pgd.21 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 04:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org. [2401:3900:2:1::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o5si3928513pgc.29.2017.03.28.04.17.31 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 04:17:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 16/17] mm: Let arch choose the initial value of task size In-Reply-To: <1490153823-29241-17-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1490153823-29241-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1490153823-29241-17-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:17:27 +1100 Message-ID: <87vaqtabw8.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Kirill A . Shutemov" , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton "Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes: > As we start supporting larger address space (>128TB), we want to give > architecture a control on max task size of an application which is different > from the TASK_SIZE. For ex: ppc64 needs to track the base page size of a segment > and it is copied from mm_context_t to PACA on each context switch. If we know that > application has not used an address range above 128TB we only need to copy > details about 128TB range to PACA. This will help in improving context switch > performance by avoiding larger copy operation. > > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > Cc: Andrew Morton > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V > --- > fs/exec.c | 10 +++++++++- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) I'll need an ACK at least on this from someone in mm land. I assume there's no way I can merge patch 17 without this? > diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c > index 65145a3df065..5550a56d03c3 100644 > --- a/fs/exec.c > +++ b/fs/exec.c > @@ -1308,6 +1308,14 @@ void would_dump(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct file *file) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(would_dump); > > +#ifndef arch_init_task_size > +static inline void arch_init_task_size(void) > +{ > + current->mm->task_size = TASK_SIZE; > +} > +#define arch_init_task_size arch_init_task_size I don't think you need to do the #define in the fallback case, it's just extra noise. > +#endif > + > void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) > { > arch_pick_mmap_layout(current->mm); cheers -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org