linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com
Subject: Re: [xfs]  83a21c1844: xfstests.xfs.533.fail
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 15:30:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tua3ou9u.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YnTcP86M0NV6lkfB@rh>

On 06 May 2022 at 13:58, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 04:03:41PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Greeting,
>> 
>> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-11):
>> 
>> commit: 83a21c18441f75aec64548692b52d34582b98a6a ("xfs: Directory's data fork extent counter can never overflow")
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>> 
>> in testcase: xfstests
>> version: xfstests-x86_64-46e1b83-1_20220414
>> with following parameters:
>> 
>> 	disk: 4HDD
>> 	fs: xfs
>> 	test: xfs-group-53
>> 	ucode: 0x21
>> 
>> test-description: xfstests is a regression test suite for xfs and other files ystems.
>> test-url: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git
>> 
>> 
>> on test machine: 4 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz with 8G memory
>> 
>> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
>> 
>> 
>> xfs/533	[failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/533.out.bad)
>>     --- tests/xfs/533.out	2022-04-14 12:51:49.000000000 +0000
>>     +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/533.out.bad	2022-05-03 06:24:37.310381846 +0000
>>     @@ -6,12 +6,4 @@
>>      Inject bmap_alloc_minlen_extent error tag
>>      * Create directory entries
>>      Verify directory's extent count
>>     -* Rename: Populate destination directory
>>     -Populate $dstdir by moving new directory entries
>>     -Verify $dstdir's extent count
>>     -* Create multiple hard links to a single file
>>     ...
>>     (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/xfs/533.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/533.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
>
> Not a regression. This is testing directory data fork extent count
> overflow using error injection, but you might notice that the title
> of the commit is "Directory's data fork extent counter can never
> overflow".
>
> IOWs, we changed fine grained directory extent count overflow
> from a runtime check (on every dir op) to an inode verifier
> check that is only run when the directory inode is read from or
> written to disk.
>
> The test probably should be removed. Chandan?
>

Yes, I have just sent a patch to fstests mailing list to remove xfs/533 test.

-- 
chandan


      reply	other threads:[~2022-05-06 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-06  8:03 kernel test robot
2022-05-06  8:28 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-06 10:00   ` Chandan Babu R [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tua3ou9u.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64 \
    --to=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox