From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>, "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] binfmt_elf: fully allocate bss pages
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 04:50:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttrimviu.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37d3392c-cf33-20a6-b5c9-8b3fb8142658@redhat.com> (Sebastian Ott's message of "Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:20:51 +0200 (CEST)")
Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com> writes:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2023, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hej,
>>>
>>> since we figured that the proposed patch is not going to work I've spent a
>>> couple more hours looking at this (some static binaries on arm64 segfault
>>> during load [0]). The segfault happens because of a failed clear_user()
>>> call in load_elf_binary(). The address we try to write zeros to is mapped with
>>> correct permissions.
>>>
>>> After some experiments I've noticed that writing to anonymous mappings work
>>> fine and all the error cases happend on file backed VMAs. Debugging showed that
>>> in elf_map() we call vm_mmap() with a file offset of 15 pages - for a binary
>>> that's less than 1KiB in size.
>>>
>>> Looking at the ELF headers again that 15 pages offset originates from the offset
>>> of the 2nd segment - so, I guess the loader did as instructed and that binary is
>>> just too nasty?
>>>
>>> Program Headers:
>>> Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr
>>> FileSiz MemSiz Flags Align
>>> LOAD 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000400000 0x0000000000400000
>>> 0x0000000000000178 0x0000000000000178 R E 0x10000
>>> LOAD 0x000000000000ffe8 0x000000000041ffe8 0x000000000041ffe8
>>> 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000008 RW 0x10000
>>> NOTE 0x0000000000000120 0x0000000000400120 0x0000000000400120
>>> 0x0000000000000024 0x0000000000000024 R 0x4
>>> GNU_STACK 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
>>> 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 RW 0x10
>>>
>>> As an additional test I've added a bunch of zeros at the end of that binary
>>> so that the offset is within that file and it did load just fine.
>>>
>>> On the other hand there is this section header:
>>> [ 4] .bss NOBITS 000000000041ffe8 0000ffe8
>>> 0000000000000008 0000000000000000 WA 0 0 1
>>>
>>> "sh_offset
>>> This member's value gives the byte offset from the beginning of the file to
>>> the first byte in the section. One section type, SHT_NOBITS described
>>> below, occupies no space in the file, and its sh_offset member locates
>>> the conceptual placement in the file.
>>> "
>>>
>>> So, still not sure what to do here..
>>>
>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5d49767a-fbdc-fbe7-5fb2-d99ece3168cb@redhat.com/
>>
>> I think that .bss section that is being generated is atrocious.
>>
>> At the same time I looked at what the linux elf loader is trying to do,
>> and the elf loader's handling of program segments with memsz > filesz
>> has serious remnants a.out of programs allocating memory with the brk
>> syscall.
>>
>> Lots of the structure looks like it started with the assumption that
>> there would only be a single program header with memsz > filesz the way
>> and that was the .bss. The way things were in the a.out days and
>> handling of other cases has been debugged in later.
>>
>> So I have modified elf_map to always return successfully when there is
>> a zero filesz in the program header for an elf segment.
>>
>> Then I have factored out a function clear_tail that ensures the zero
>> padding for an entire elf segment is present.
>>
>> Please test this and see if it causes your test case to work.
>
> Sadly, that causes issues for other programs:
Bah. Too much cleanup at once.
I will respin.
> [ 44.164596] Run /init as init process
> [ 44.168763] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b
> [ 44.176409] CPU: 32 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2+ #89
> [ 44.182404] Hardware name: GIGABYTE R181-T92-00/MT91-FS4-00, BIOS F34 08/13/2020
> [ 44.189786] Call trace:
> [ 44.192220] dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130
> [ 44.195961] show_stack+0x20/0x38
> [ 44.199264] dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x60
> [ 44.202917] dump_stack+0x18/0x28
> [ 44.206219] panic+0x2e0/0x350
> [ 44.209264] do_exit+0x370/0x390
> [ 44.212481] do_group_exit+0x3c/0xa0
> [ 44.216044] get_signal+0x800/0x808
> [ 44.219521] do_signal+0xfc/0x200
> [ 44.222824] do_notify_resume+0xc8/0x418
> [ 44.226734] el0_da+0x114/0x120
> [ 44.229866] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0x130
> [ 44.234124] el0t_64_sync+0x194/0x198
> [ 44.237776] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> [ 44.241740] Kernel Offset: disabled
> [ 44.245215] CPU features: 0x03000000,14028142,10004203
> [ 44.250342] Memory Limit: none
> [ 44.253383] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b ]---
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-25 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-14 15:59 Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-14 19:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-09-14 22:18 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-15 19:35 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-09-15 22:15 ` Pedro Falcato
2023-09-15 22:41 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-18 14:11 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-21 10:36 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-09-25 0:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-09-25 9:20 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-09-25 9:50 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2023-09-25 12:59 ` [PATCH] binfmt_elf: Support segments with 0 filesz and misaligned starts Eric W. Biederman
2023-09-25 15:27 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-09-25 17:06 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-26 3:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-09-27 2:34 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-26 13:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-09-26 14:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ttrimviu.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=sebott@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox