From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>,
Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>,
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] ACPI / APEI: Generalise the estatus queue's add/remove and notify code
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:26:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sh9vzfdn.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180215185606.26736-3-james.morse@arm.com>
A few of typos and comments below.
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> writes:
> To support asynchronous NMI-like notifications on arm64 we need to use
> the estatus-queue. These patches refactor it to allow multiple APEI
> notification types to use it.
>
> Refactor the estatus queue's pool grow/shrink code and notification
> routine from NOTIFY_NMI's handlers. This will allow another notification
> method to use the estatus queue without duplicating this code.
>
> This patch adds rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() around the list
> list_for_each_entry_rcu() walker. These aren't strictly necessary as
> the whole nmi_enter/nmi_exit() window is a spooky RCU read-side
> critical section.
>
> Keep the oops_begin() call for x86, arm64 doesn't have one of these,
> and APEI is the only thing outside arch code calling this..
>
> The existing ghes_estatus_pool_shrink() is folded into the new
> ghes_estatus_queue_shrink_pool() as only the queue uses it.
>
> _in_nmi_notify_one() is separate from the rcu-list walker for a later
> caller that doesn't need to walk a list.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index e42b587c509b..d3cc5bd5b496 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -749,6 +749,54 @@ static void __process_error(struct ghes *ghes)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static int _in_nmi_notify_one(struct ghes *ghes)
> +{
> + int sev;
> + int ret = -ENOENT;
If ret is initialised to 0 ...
> +
> + if (ghes_read_estatus(ghes, 1)) {
> + ghes_clear_estatus(ghes);
> + return ret;
and return -ENOENT here...
> + } else {
> + ret = 0;
> + }
... then the else block can be dropped.
> +
> + sev = ghes_severity(ghes->estatus->error_severity);
> + if (sev >= GHES_SEV_PANIC) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> + oops_begin();
> +#endif
Can you use IS_ENABLED() here as well?
> + ghes_print_queued_estatus();
> + __ghes_panic(ghes);
> + }
> +
> + if (!(ghes->flags & GHES_TO_CLEAR))
> + return ret;
> +
> + __process_error(ghes);
> + ghes_clear_estatus(ghes);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ghes_estatus_queue_notified(struct list_head *rcu_list)
> +{
> + int ret = -ENOENT;
> + struct ghes *ghes;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(ghes, rcu_list, list) {
> + if (!_in_nmi_notify_one(ghes))
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG) && ret == 0)
> + irq_work_queue(&ghes_proc_irq_work);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static unsigned long ghes_esource_prealloc_size(
> const struct acpi_hest_generic *generic)
> {
> @@ -764,11 +812,24 @@ static unsigned long ghes_esource_prealloc_size(
> return prealloc_size;
> }
>
> -static void ghes_estatus_pool_shrink(unsigned long len)
> +/* After removing a queue user, we can shrink to pool */
^
the
Thanks,
Punit
> +static void ghes_estatus_queue_shrink_pool(struct ghes *ghes)
> {
> + unsigned long len;
> +
> + len = ghes_esource_prealloc_size(ghes->generic);
> ghes_estatus_pool_size_request -= PAGE_ALIGN(len);
> }
>
[...]
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-15 18:55 [PATCH 00/11] APEI in_nmi() rework and arm64 SDEI wire-up James Morse
2018-02-15 18:55 ` [PATCH 01/11] ACPI / APEI: Move the estatus queue code up, and under its own ifdef James Morse
2018-02-20 18:26 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-02-20 19:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-23 18:02 ` James Morse
2018-02-23 18:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-15 18:55 ` [PATCH 02/11] ACPI / APEI: Generalise the estatus queue's add/remove and notify code James Morse
2018-02-20 18:26 ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
2018-02-23 18:21 ` James Morse
2018-03-01 15:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-01 18:06 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-03-01 22:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-07 18:15 ` James Morse
2018-03-08 10:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-19 14:29 ` James Morse
2018-03-27 17:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-28 16:30 ` James Morse
2018-04-17 15:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-15 18:55 ` [PATCH 03/11] ACPI / APEI: Switch NOTIFY_SEA to use the estatus queue James Morse
2018-02-15 18:55 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: arm/arm64: Add kvm_ras.h to collect kvm specific RAS plumbing James Morse
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 05/11] arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface James Morse
2018-02-20 18:30 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 06/11] ACPI / APEI: Make the fixmap_idx per-ghes to allow multiple in_nmi() users James Morse
2018-02-20 21:18 ` Tyler Baicar
2018-02-22 17:47 ` James Morse
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 07/11] ACPI / APEI: Split fixmap pages for arm64 NMI-like notifications James Morse
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 08/11] firmware: arm_sdei: Add ACPI GHES registration helper James Morse
2018-02-20 18:31 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 09/11] ACPI / APEI: Add support for the SDEI GHES Notification type James Morse
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 10/11] mm/memory-failure: increase queued recovery work's priority James Morse
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 11/11] arm64: acpi: Make apei_claim_sea() synchronise with APEI's irq work James Morse
2018-02-19 21:05 ` [PATCH 00/11] APEI in_nmi() rework and arm64 SDEI wire-up Borislav Petkov
2018-02-20 18:42 ` Punit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sh9vzfdn.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=gengdongjiu@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox